A Nationwide Evaluation of Cardiothoracic Resident Research Productivity
- PMID: 37640148
- PMCID: PMC10842395
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.08.011
A Nationwide Evaluation of Cardiothoracic Resident Research Productivity
Abstract
Background: Evaluating the research productivity of cardiothoracic surgery residents during their training and early career is crucial for tracking their academic development. To this end, the training pathway of residents and the characteristics of their program in relation to their productivity were evaluated.
Methods: Alumni lists from integrated 6-year thoracic surgery (I-6) and traditional thoracic surgery residency programs were collected. A Python script was used to search PubMed for publications and the iCite database for citations from each trainee. Publications during a 20-year time span were stratified by the year of publication in relation to the trainee's graduation from thoracic surgery residency. Trainees were analyzed by training program type, institutional availability of a cardiothoracic surgery T32 training grant, and protected academic development time.
Results: A total of 741 cardiothoracic surgery graduates (I-6, 70; traditional, 671) spanning 1971 to 2021 from 57 programs published >23,000 manuscripts. I-6 trainees published significantly more manuscripts during medical school and residency compared with traditional trainees. Trainees at institutions with cardiothoracic surgery T32 training grants published significantly more manuscripts than those at non-T32 institutions (13 vs 9; P = .0048). I-6 trainees published more manuscripts at programs with dedicated academic development time compared with trainees at programs without protected time (22 vs 9; P = .004).
Conclusions: I-6 trainees publish significantly more manuscripts during medical school and residency compared with their traditional colleagues. Trainees at institutions with T32 training grants and dedicated academic development time publish a higher number of manuscripts than trainees without those opportunities.
Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





Comment in
-
The Aspiring Surgeon-Scientist: Evaluating Training Factors That Increase Scholarly Activity.Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Feb;117(2):456-457. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.10.011. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 37863348 No abstract available.
-
Inequities in Candidate Opportunities Persist.Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec;118(6):1340-1341. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.04.026. Epub 2024 May 13. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38750685 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kron IL. Getting promoted. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2001;121(4):S17–S18. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources