Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;82(10):1258-1270.
doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224609. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria

Medha Barbhaiya #  1 Stephane Zuily #  2 Ray Naden  3 Alison Hendry  4 Florian Manneville  5 Mary-Carmen Amigo  6 Zahir Amoura  7 Danieli Andrade  8 Laura Andreoli  9 Bahar Artim-Esen  10 Tatsuya Atsumi  11 Tadej Avcin  12 H Michael Belmont  13 Maria Laura Bertolaccini  14 D Ware Branch  15 Graziela Carvalheiras  16 Alessandro Casini  17 Ricard Cervera  18 Hannah Cohen  19 Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau  20 Mark Crowther  21 Guilherme de Jesús  22 Aurelien Delluc  23 Sheetal Desai  24 Maria De Sancho  25 Katrien M Devreese  26   27 Reyhan Diz-Kucukkaya  28 Ali Duarte-García  29 Camille Frances  30 David Garcia  31 Jean-Christophe Gris  32 Natasha Jordan  33 Rebecca K Leaf  34 Nina Kello  35 Jason S Knight  36 Carl Laskin  37 Alfred I Lee  38 Kimberly Legault  39 Steve R Levine  40 Roger A Levy  41   42 Maarten Limper  43 Michael D Lockshin  1 Karoline Mayer-Pickel  44 Jack Musial  45 Pier Luigi Meroni  46 Giovanni Orsolini  47 Thomas L Ortel  48 Vittorio Pengo  49 Michelle Petri  50 Guillermo Pons-Estel  51 Jose A Gomez-Puerta  52 Quentin Raimboug  53 Robert Roubey  54 Giovanni Sanna  55 Surya V Seshan  56 Savino Sciascia  57   58 Maria G Tektonidou  59 Angela Tincani  9 Denis Wahl  2 Rohan Willis  60 Cécile Yelnik  61 Catherine Zuily  62 Francis Guillemin  5 Karen Costenbader  63 Doruk Erkan  64 ACR/EULAR APS Classification Criteria Collaborators
Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria

Medha Barbhaiya et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To develop new antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and trials, jointly supported by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR.

Methods: This international multidisciplinary initiative included four phases: (1) Phase I, criteria generation by surveys and literature review; (2) Phase II, criteria reduction by modified Delphi and nominal group technique exercises; (3) Phase III, criteria definition, further reduction with the guidance of real-world patient scenarios, and weighting via consensus-based multicriteria decision analysis, and threshold identification; and (4) Phase IV, validation using independent adjudicators' consensus as the gold standard.

Results: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria include an entry criterion of at least one positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) test within 3 years of identification of an aPL-associated clinical criterion, followed by additive weighted criteria (score range 1-7 points each) clustered into six clinical domains (macrovascular venous thromboembolism, macrovascular arterial thrombosis, microvascular, obstetric, cardiac valve, and hematologic) and two laboratory domains (lupus anticoagulant functional coagulation assays, and solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for IgG/IgM anticardiolipin and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies). Patients accumulating at least three points each from the clinical and laboratory domains are classified as having APS. In the validation cohort, the new APS criteria vs the 2006 revised Sapporo classification criteria had a specificity of 99% vs 86%, and a sensitivity of 84% vs 99%.

Conclusion: These new ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary international input. Hierarchically clustered, weighted, and risk-stratified criteria reflect the current thinking about APS, providing high specificity and a strong foundation for future APS research.

Keywords: antibodies, antiphospholipid; antiphospholipid syndrome; thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RAL is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline.

LinkOut - more resources