Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;26(1):114-123.
doi: 10.1007/s11307-023-01851-4. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

The Balance Between the Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB in a Preclinical Prostate Cancer Model

Affiliations

The Balance Between the Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB in a Preclinical Prostate Cancer Model

Marjolein Verhoeven et al. Mol Imaging Biol. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Radiolabeled NeoB is a promising gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-targeting radiopharmaceutical for theranostics of GRPR-expressing malignancies, e.g., prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different doses of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB on the balance between therapeutic efficacy and safety in a preclinical PCa model.

Procedures: To determine the efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB, PC-3 xenografted mice received 3 sham injections (control group) or 3 injections of 30 MBq/300 pmol, 40 MBq/400 pmol, or 60 MBq/600 pmol [177Lu]Lu-NeoB (groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively) 1 week apart. To quantify tumor uptake, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging was performed 4 h after the first, second, and third injection on a separate group of animals. For safety evaluations, pancreatic and renal tissues of non-tumor-bearing mice treated with the abovementioned [177Lu]Lu-NeoB doses were evaluated 12 and 24 weeks post-treatment.

Results: Treatment of PC-3 tumors with all three studied [177Lu]Lu-NeoB doses was effective. Median survival times were significantly (p < 0.0001) improved for treatment groups 1, 2, and 3 versus the control group (82 days, 89 days, 99 days versus 19 days, respectively). However, no significant differences were observed between treatment groups. Quantification of SPECT/CT images showed minimal differences in the average absolute radioactivity uptake, especially after the third injection. Histopathological analysis revealed no clear signs of treatment-related pancreatic toxicity. For the kidneys, atrophy and fibrosis were observed for one animal from group 1 and a chronic inflammatory response was observed for both animals from group 3 at 24 weeks post-treatment.

Conclusions: Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-NeoB is effective in a preclinical PCa model. Adjusting the administered dose could positively impact the risk-benefit balance as a higher dose might not lead to an increased therapeutic effect, but it may lead to an increase in toxicological effects in healthy organs such as the kidneys.

Keywords: Efficacy; Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR); Prostate cancer; Theranostics; Toxicity; [177Lu]Lu-NeoB.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial interests: F.O., D.B. and M.T. are employed by Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Tumor volume (A), extrapolated tumor volume (B), and percent of survival (C) of PC-3 tumor-bearing mice untreated/sham-treated (control), or treated with 3 injections of 30 MBq/300 pmol (group 1), 40 MBq/400 pmol (group 2), or 60 MBq/600 pmol of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB (group 3) on day 0, 7, and 14. The mean tumor volume with 95% confidence interval is presented for the time period that all data points of the group were available (i.e., tumor volume of no animal in the group exceeded 2000 mm3) (A) or for the duration until the tumor limit of 2000 mm3 was reached based on extrapolated growth curves (B). The dotted line indicates the start of treatment. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative SPECT/CT images (A) acquired 4 h post the first, second, and third injection of animals treated with 3 × 30 MBq/300 pmol (group 1), 3 × 40 MBq/400 pmol (group 2), or 3 × 60 MBq/600 pmol of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB (group 3). Images show an overlay of a CT slice and the corresponding SPECT slice on which the cross-section of the tumor is clearly visible. Arrows indicate the tumor and the scale bar shows the linear scaling running from min-max of the signal present in the images. The mean quantified tumor uptake with the range is expressed as %IA/mL (B) and MBq/mL (C) (n = 2 per group)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Animal weight before and after treatment with 3 × sham injection (control) or 3 × 30 MBq/300 pmol (group 1), 3 × 40 MBq/400 pmol (group 2), and 3 × 60 MBq/600 pmol of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB (group 3) up to 12 weeks (A) and 24 weeks (B). ID numbers represent the identification number for each individual animal
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Representative H&E staining of pancreatic tissue from untreated (control) and treated animals (3× 30 MBq/300 pmol (group 1), 3× 40 MBq/400 pmol (group 2), and 3× 60 MBq/600 pmol of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB (group 3)) after 12 and 24 weeks. ID numbers represent the identification number of the animal
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Representative H&E staining of renal tissue from untreated (control) and treated animals (3× 30 MBq/300 pmol (group 1), 3× 40 MBq/400 pmol (group 2), and 3× 60 MBq/600 pmol of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB (group 3)) after 12 and 24 weeks. Areas circled in black indicate regions with low (ID: B, 6 and 8) or high (ID: 11) lymphocyte infiltration. The area circled in blue shows a region of atrophy and fibrosis (ID: 3). ID numbers represent the identification number of the animal

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guo M, Qu X, Qin XQ. Bombesin-like peptides and their receptors: recent findings in pharmacology and physiology. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2015;22:3–8. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000126. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ananias HJ, de Jong IJ, Dierckx RA, van de Wiele C, Helfrich W, Elsinga PH. Nuclear imaging of prostate cancer with gastrin-releasing-peptide-receptor targeted radiopharmaceuticals. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:3033–3047. doi: 10.2174/138161208786404335. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maina T, Nock BA. From bench to bed: new gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-directed radioligands and their use in prostate cancer. PET Clin. 2017;12:205–217. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2016.12.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nock BA, Kaloudi A, Lymperis E, et al. Theranostic perspectives in prostate cancer with the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist NeoBOMB1: preclinical and first clinical results. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:75–80. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178889. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang J, Niu G, Fan X, et al. PET using a GRPR antagonist (68)Ga-RM26 in healthy volunteers and prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:922–928. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.198929. - DOI - PMC - PubMed