Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 28;9(1):38.
doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00334-w.

Effect of mixing at weaning and nutrient density of the weaner diet on growth performance and welfare of pigs to slaughter

Affiliations

Effect of mixing at weaning and nutrient density of the weaner diet on growth performance and welfare of pigs to slaughter

Francesc González-Solé et al. Porcine Health Manag. .

Abstract

Background: Mixing pigs at weaning can compromise pig welfare and growth. Therefore, grouping littermates together may allow a diet nutrient and energy density reduction during the nursery period to reduce feed cost without affecting slaughter weight. This study investigated the combined effect of mixing and reducing dietary energy and nutrient density on growth performance, body lesions (BL), and behaviour in pigs from weaning to slaughter.

Results: Forty-eight litters [554 pigs, 11-12 pigs/litter; Danish Duroc × (Large White × Landrace)] were included in the trial. At 28 days of age, pigs were weaned and housed in nursery rooms in litter groups (INTACT, n = 24) or mixed with other litters and grouped by weight to reduce within-pen pig weight variation (MIXED, n = 24). A dietary regimen meeting pigs' nutritional requirements (CON) and a low-density dietary regimen (LOW; -10% energy and protein) completed a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement (Mixing x Diet, n = 12). On day 74 of age, pigs moved to the grower-finisher accommodation without further mixing and all pigs received the CON dietary regimen. Mixing increased FCR by 4.0% during the nursery period (p = 0.003). Nursery pigs fed LOW experienced a growth retardation which was maintained until slaughter (-2.6 kg slaughter weight; p = 0.025). Initial differences in the coefficient of variation (CV) between MIXED (10.4%) and INTACT (17.6%; p < 0.001) pigs were reduced in CON pens but not in LOW pens (interaction p = 0.025) at the end of the nursery period. MIXED pigs had more fights and BL (p < 0.001) at weaning and showed more aggression (p = 0.003) after being moved to the grower-finisher rooms. At the end of the nursery period, MIXED pigs fed LOW showed the highest number of aggressive behaviours around the feeder (interaction; p = 0.003) and pigs fed LOW showed more damaging behaviour (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Mixing animals at weaning had limited impact on growth performance but impaired welfare which was aggravated by energy and nutrient reduction in the nursery diet. Decreasing dietary nutrient density in the nursery stage retarded growth, which could not be compensated for during the growing-finishing period.

Keywords: Behaviour; Chronic aggression; Compensatory growth; Dominance hierarchy; Feed competition; Regrouping; Skin lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Evolution of the coefficient of variation for within pen pig weight (mean ± SD). Weaning: mixing effect (p < 0.001); End of nursery (d74): interaction mixing × diet (p = 0.025); End of growing-finishing: mixing effect (p = 0.084)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peden RSE, Turner SP, Boyle LA, Camerlink I. The translation of animal welfare research into practice: the case of mixing aggression between pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018;204:1–9.
    1. van Staaveren N, Teixeira DL, Hanlon A, Boyle LA. The effect of mixing entire male Pigs prior to transport to Slaughter on Behaviour, Welfare and carcass lesions. PLoS ONE. 2015;10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conte S, Lawlor PG, O’Connell N, Boyle LA. Effect of split marketing on the welfare, performance, and carcass traits of finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:373–80. - PubMed
    1. O’Quinn PR, Swanson JC, Musser RE, Musser RE, Goodband RD, Tokach MD, et al. Sorting growing-finishing pigs by weight fails to improve growth performance or weight variation. Kans Agricultural Exp Stn Res Rep. 2000;0:135–8.
    1. Stookey JM, Gonyou HW. The effects of regrouping on behavioral and production parameters in finishing swine. J Anim Sci. 1994;72:2804–11. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources