Remote Cochlear Implant Assessments: Validity and Stability in Self-Administered Smartphone-Based Testing
- PMID: 37641179
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001422
Remote Cochlear Implant Assessments: Validity and Stability in Self-Administered Smartphone-Based Testing
Abstract
Objectives: The stability of remote testing in cochlear implant care was studied by testing the influence of time-of-day, listener fatigue, and motivation on the outcomes of the aided threshold test (ATT) and digit triplets test (DTT) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients using self-tests at-home on a smartphone or tablet.
Design: A single-center repeated measures cohort study design (n = 50 adult CI recipients). The ATT and DTT were tested at-home ten times, with nine of these sessions planned within a period of eight days. Outcomes were modeled as a function of time-of-day, momentary motivation, listeners' task-related fatigue, and chronotype (i.e., someone's preference for morning or evening due to the sleep-wake cycle) using linear mixed models. Additional factors included aided monosyllabic word recognition in quiet, daily-life fatigue, age, and CI experience.
Results: Out of 500 planned measurements, 407 ATTs and 476 DTTs were completed. The ATT determined thresholds and impedances were stable across sessions. The factors in the DTT model explained 75% of the total variance. Forty-nine percent of the total variance was explained by individual differences in the participants' DTT performance. For each 10% increase in word recognition in quiet, the DTT speech reception threshold improved by an average of 1.6 dB. DTT speech reception threshold improved, on average by 0.1 dB per repeated session and correlated with the number of successful DTTs per participant. There was no significant time-of-day effect on auditory performance in at-home administered tests.
Conclusions: This study is one of the first to report on the validity and stability of remote assessments in CI recipients and reveals relevant factors. CI recipients can be self-tested at any waking hour to monitor performance via smartphone or tablet. Motivation, task-related fatigue, and chronotype did not affect the outcomes of ATT or DTT in the studied cohort. Word recognition in quiet is a good predictor for deciding whether the DTT should be included in an individual's remote test battery. At-home testing is reliable for cochlear implant recipients and offers an opportunity to provide care in a virtual hearing clinic setting.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Remote Check: A Clinical Tool for Asynchronous Monitoring and Triage of Cochlear Implant Recipients.Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):495-506. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001106. Ear Hear. 2022. PMID: 34320523 Free PMC article.
-
Is the digit triplet test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment?Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Mar;18(2):97-105. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2016.1273435. Epub 2017 Jan 25. Cochlear Implants Int. 2017. PMID: 28120703
-
Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.Ear Hear. 2004 Aug;25(4):375-87. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000134552.22205.ee. Ear Hear. 2004. PMID: 15292777
-
Asymmetric Hearing Loss in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: Results and Recommendations From a Multisite Prospective Clinical Trial.Ear Hear. 2023 Sep-Oct 01;44(5):1140-1156. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001354. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Ear Hear. 2023. PMID: 37018114 Free PMC article.
-
Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):1-165. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 32194878 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
App-based daily self-measurement of impedance in cochlear implant users.Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 4;16:1618031. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1618031. eCollection 2025. Front Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40689329 Free PMC article.
-
Patient preferences for Remote cochlear implant management: A discrete choice experiment.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0320421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320421. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40460110 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic development of speech-in-noise hearing tests using machine learning.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 15;15(1):12878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96312-z. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40234643 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous Translabyrinthine Vestibular Schwannoma Removal and Cochlear Implantation: Assessment of Wireless Connection Speech Test.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jul 23;10(4):e70197. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70197. eCollection 2025 Aug. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 40703198 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abdullah S., Murnane E.L., Matthews M., Kay M., Kientz J. A., Gay G., Choudhury T. (2016). Cognitive rhythms: unobtrusive and continuous sensing of alertness using a mobile phone. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. UbiComp ’16. (pp. 178–189). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971712 .
-
- Abegunde D. O., Mathers C. D., Adam T., Ortegon M., Strong K. (2007). The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet, 370, 1929–1938.
-
- Alhanbali S., Dawes P., Lloyd S., Munro K. J. (2017). Self-reported listening-related effort and fatigue in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear, 38, e39–e48.
-
- Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw, 67, 1–48.
-
- Castor EDC. (2022). Castor Electronic Data Capture (EDC) [online]. https://www.castoredc.com .
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous