Artificial Airway Suctioning: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 37641766
- PMCID: PMC10460288
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42579
Artificial Airway Suctioning: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Airway suctioning is routinely performed in the majority of care circumstances, including acute care, subacute care, home-based settings, and long-term care. Using an artificial airway to suction the patient allows for the mobilization and evacuation of secretions. When a patient can't independently remove all of the secretions from their respiratory tract, suction is used. This can occur when the body produces excessive secretion or it is not eliminated quickly enough, causing the respiratory system's upper and lower respiratory secretions to accumulate. Airway blockage and inadequate breathing may result from this. Ultimately, this leads to a shortage of oxygen and carbon dioxide from the air, both of which are necessary for ideal cellular activity. Artificial airway suctioning is one of the most crucial components of airway care and a core competency for medical professionals trying to ensure airway patency. Artificial airway suctioning is a standard treatment carried out every day globally and is frequently done in both outpatient and inpatient patients. Therefore, specialists must know the safest and most efficient ways to perform surgery and any potential side effects. In ventilated infants and children, the removal of obstructive secretions by endotracheal suctioning is frequently done. It is unknown how suctioning affects the mechanics of breathing. This study used a prospective observational clinical design to examine the immediate impact of airway resistance in endotracheal suctioning, tidal volume, and dynamic lung regulation in mechanically ventilated adult patients and mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. The preparation, process, and indications for intraoperative fusion treatment in various circumstances are covered in this systematic review.
Keywords: artificial airway suctioning; closed suctioning; endotracheal suctioning; gastric lavage; oropharyngeal airway suctioning.
Copyright © 2023, Sontakke et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- AARC clinical practice Guidelines: artificial airway suctioning. Blakeman TC, Scott JB, Yoder MA, Capellari E, Strickland SL. Respir Care. 2022;67:258–271. - PubMed
-
- AARC clinical practice guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways 2010. American Association for Respiratory Care. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20507660/ Respir Care. 2010;55:758–764. - PubMed
-
- Decreasing the adverse effects of endotracheal suctioning during mechanical ventilation by changing practice. Maggiore SM, Lellouche F, Pignataro C, et al. Respir Care. 2013;58:1588–1597. - PubMed
-
- Airway management and ventilator-associated events. Dexter AM, Scott JB. Respir Care. 2019;64:986–993. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources