Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Oct;45(10):2710-2717.
doi: 10.1002/hed.27500. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

Implantable arterial doppler efficacy in free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Implantable arterial doppler efficacy in free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kevin G Wu et al. Head Neck. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

The implantable arterial doppler (IAD) is frequently used to postoperatively monitor free flaps with high accuracy, but there are no guidelines for its use. Bedside exam is used adjunctively to determine necessary intervention. This systematic review seeks to discover why the doppler is used adjunctively despite its established record of accuracy. Criteria for inclusion and exclusion were established. In total, 280 articles were found on PubMed and Web of Science, then screened accordingly. Data from 22 articles were analyzed using a bivariate hierarchical random effects model. Twenty-two studies yielded 2996 total patients undergoing 3127 free flap procedures. The meta-analysis found a high sensitivity of 0.809 (95% CI = 0.709, 0.880) and specificity of 0.966 (95% CI = 0.947, 0.979). False-positive rate was found to be 0.034 (95% CI = 0.021, 0.053). Positive and negative predictive values were 0.711 (95% CI = 0.581, 0.817) and 0.979 (95% CI = 0.966, 0.988). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 24.7 (95% CI = 14.5, 39.5) and 0.20 (95% CI = 0.12, 0.30). The established efficacy of the IAD is supported by this study. Clinical exams may remain as the final adjunct due to the risks of inaccurate IAD signals. Further studies are warranted to optimize its use for future practice guidelines.

Keywords: flap monitoring; free flap; implantable doppler; microvascular surgery; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Parker PM, Fischer JC, Shaw WW. Implantable pulsed doppler cuff for long-term monitoring of free flaps: a preliminary study. Microsurgery. 1984;5(3):130-135.
    1. Guillemaud JP, Seikaly H, Cote D, Allen H, Harris JR. The implantable cook-Swartz doppler probe for postoperative monitoring in head and neck free flap reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(7):729-734.
    1. Schmulder A, Gur E, Zaretski A. Eight-year experience of the cook-Swartz doppler in free-flap operations: microsurgical and reexploration results with regard to a wide spectrum of surgeries. Microsurgery. 2011;31(1):1-6.
    1. Hosein RC, Cornejo A, Wang HT. Postoperative monitoring of free flap reconstruction: a comparison of external doppler ultrasonography and the implantable doppler probe. Plast Surg. 2016;24(1):11-19.
    1. Langenfeld TL, Wu KG, Anderson SR, et al. Examining trends in implantable arterial doppler usage amongst North American head & neck microsurgeons: A survey study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023.

LinkOut - more resources