Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331168.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31168.

Estimating Sepsis Incidence Using Administrative Data and Clinical Medical Record Review

Lisa Mellhammar  1 , Erik Wollter  1 , Jacob Dahlberg  1 , Benjamin Donovan  1 , Carl-Johan Olséen  1 , Per Ola Wiking  1 , Norman Rose  2 , Daniel Schwarzkopf  2 , Marcus Friedrich  3   4 , Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek  2 , Konrad Reinhart  2   3   5 , Adam Linder  1
Affiliations
Observational Study

Estimating Sepsis Incidence Using Administrative Data and Clinical Medical Record Review

Lisa Mellhammar et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Despite the large health burden, reliable data on sepsis epidemiology are lacking; studies using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-coded hospital discharge diagnosis for sepsis identification suffer from limited sensitivity. Also, ICD data do not allow investigation of underlying pathogens and antimicrobial resistance.

Objectives: To generate reliable epidemiological estimates by linking data from a population-based database to a reference standard of clinical medical record review.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using a population-based administrative database including all acute care hospitals of the Scania region in Sweden in 2019 and 2020 to identify hospital-treated sepsis cases by ICD codes. From this database, clinical medical records were also selected for review within 6 strata defined by ICD discharge diagnosis (both with and without sepsis diagnosis). Data were analyzed from April to October 2022.

Main outcomes and measures: Hospital and population incidences of sepsis, case fatality, antimicrobial resistance, and temporal dynamics due to COVID-19 were assessed, as well as validity of ICD-10 case identification methods compared with the reference standard of clinical medical record review.

Results: Out of 295 531 hospitalizations in 2019 in the Scania region of Sweden, 997 patient medical records were reviewed, among which 457 had sepsis according to clinical criteria. Of the patients with clinical sepsis, 232 (51%) were female, and 357 (78%) had at least 1 comorbidity. The median (IQR) age of the cohort was 76 (67-85) years. The incidence of sepsis in hospitalized patients according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) criteria in 2019 was 4.1% (95% CI, 3.6-4.5) by medical record review. This corresponds to an annual incidence rate of 747 (95% CI, 663-832) patients with sepsis per 100 000 population. No significant increase in sepsis during the COVID-19 pandemic nor a decrease in sepsis incidence when excluding COVID-19 sepsis was observed. Few sepsis cases caused by pathogens with antimicrobial resistance were found. The validity of ICD-10-based case identification in administrative data was low.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of sepsis epidemiology, sepsis was a considerable burden to public health in Sweden. Supplying administrative data with information from clinical medical records can help to generate reliable data on sepsis epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Donovan reported receiving grants from the Medical Faculty at Lund University during the conduct of the study. Dr Reinhart reported holding shares from InflaRx who have received an Emergency Use Authorization by the US Food and Drug Administration for for the treatment of viral sepsis related to COVID-19. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Schematic of Study Extraction and Design
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, Kallan MJ, Carr BG. Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(5):1167-1174. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c09f8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhee C, Murphy MV, Li L, Platt R, Klompas M; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenters Program . Comparison of trends in sepsis incidence and coding using administrative claims versus objective clinical data. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(1):88-95. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu750 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, et al. . Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(8):1552-1562. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilhelms SB, Huss FR, Granath G, Sjöberg F. Assessment of incidence of severe sepsis in Sweden using different ways of abstracting International Classification of Diseases codes: difficulties with methods and interpretation of results. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(6):1442-1449. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181de4406 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, et al. ; CDC Prevention Epicenter Program . Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009-2014. JAMA. 2017;318(13):1241-1249. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.13836 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances