Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Nov 20;41(33):5174-5183.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00558. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

Phase II Trial of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Relapsed/Refractory BRAF V600-Mutant Pediatric High-Grade Glioma

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase II Trial of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Relapsed/Refractory BRAF V600-Mutant Pediatric High-Grade Glioma

Darren R Hargrave et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: BRAF V600 mutation is detected in 5%-10% of pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGGs), and effective treatments are limited. In previous trials, dabrafenib as monotherapy or in combination with trametinib demonstrated activity in children and adults with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600-mutant HGG.

Methods: This phase II study evaluated dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600-mutant pHGG. The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) by independent review by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Secondary objectives included ORR by investigator determination, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: A total of 41 pediatric patients with previously treated BRAF V600-mutant HGG were enrolled. At primary analysis, median follow-up was 25.1 months, and 51% of patients remained on treatment. Sixteen of 20 discontinuations were due to progressive disease in this relapsed/refractory pHGG population. Independently assessed ORR was 56% (95% CI, 40 to 72). Median DOR was 22.2 months (95% CI, 7.6 months to not reached [NR]). Fourteen deaths were reported. Median OS was 32.8 months (95% CI, 19.2 months to NR). The most common all-cause adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (51%), headache (34%), and dry skin (32%). Two patients (5%) had AEs (both rash) leading to discontinuation.

Conclusion: In relapsed/refractory BRAF V600-mutant pHGG, dabrafenib plus trametinib improved ORR versus previous trials of chemotherapy in molecularly unselected patients with pHGG and was associated with durable responses and encouraging survival. These findings suggest that dabrafenib plus trametinib is a promising targeted therapy option for children and adolescents with relapsed/refractory BRAF V600-mutant HGG.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02684058.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Phase II Trial of Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in Relapsed/Refractory

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Darren R. Hargrave

Honoraria: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Alexion Pharmaceuticals

Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim

Speakers' Bureau: Alexion Pharmaceuticals

Research Funding: AstraZeneca

Expert Testimony: AstraZeneca

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Alexion Pharmaceuticals

Other Relationship: Celgene, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Epizyme, AbbVie, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Day One Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines

Keita Terashima

Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai Pharma

Consulting or Advisory Role: Alexion Pharmaceuticals

Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Ohara Pharmaceutical (Inst)

Uncompensated Relationships: Lilly Japan

Junichi Hara

Consulting or Advisory Role: Ohara Pharmaceutical

Speakers' Bureau: Chugai Pharma, Ohara Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Amgen, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology

Santhosh A. Upadhyaya

Research Funding: Takeda (Inst), Novartis (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb

Felix Sahm

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Heidelberg Epignostix GmbH

Honoraria: Illumina

Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer

Speakers' Bureau: 10xgenomics

Eric Bouffet

Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Alexion Pharmaceuticals

Research Funding: Roche (Inst)

Roger J. Packer

Honoraria: Novartis

Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca

Olaf Witt

Honoraria: Roche Pharma AG

Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Janssen Research & Development (Inst), BMS, Roche, Day One Therapeutics, SK Life Sciences, Merck KGaA

Research Funding: Janssen Research & Development (Inst), PreComb Therapeutics (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb/Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Roche Pharma AG (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Loxo/Bayer (Inst), Loxo (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Day One Therapeutics (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Bayer (Inst)

Larissa Sandalic

Employment: Novartis, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Novartis, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen, Chinook Therapeutics, Neoleukin Therapeutics, Celldex

Mark Russo

Employment: Novartis

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Novartis

Kenneth J. Cohen

Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, DNAtrix

Research Funding: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
(A) Best change from baseline in tumor measurement (independent review per RANO criteria). (B) Percent changes from baseline in tumor measurements at 1 year/last assessment (independent review per RANO criteria; full analysis set). Patients for whom the percent change of target lesions was not available or for whom the BOR was unknown were excluded from the analysis. If the change in tumor size at 1 year/last visit before day 322 was not confirmed by a repeat scan, the BOR may not be consistent with the percent change from baseline. Only patients with measurable disease at baseline were included. Waterfall plots are based on radiographic response per RANO criteria, without consideration of clinical status or corticosteroid use. One patient with a BOR of PD had a radiographic response of SD. aSD for ≥16 weeks is recorded at ≥15 weeks (ie, ≥105 days) from treatment start date. bOne patient did not have a valid postbaseline assessment and two had SD and/or unconfirmed CR/PR only occurring before week 16. cSD for ≥24 weeks is recorded at ≥23 weeks (ie, ≥161 days) from treatment start date. dPercent change in target lesion contradicted by overall lesion response of PD. ePatients not in the evaluable set. The evaluable set, used for sensitivity analyses, comprised all patients in the as-treated population with centrally confirmed HGG through histology, centrally confirmed positive BRAF V600 mutation status, adequate tumor assessment at baseline, and a follow-up tumor assessment ≥8 weeks after starting treatment (unless disease progression was observed before that time) or had discontinued for any reason. fPercent change is 491.43. gPatient did not have an assessment at 1 year (defined as day 322-399), and their last visit before day 322 is presented in the figure. BOR, best overall response; CBR, clinical benefit rate; CR, complete response; dab, dabrafenib; HGG, high-grade glioma; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; RANO, Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology; SD, stable disease; tram, trametinib.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) Time to onset of response by independent assessment. Only the first occurrence of each response (CR, PR) and/or PD are displayed. (B) Duration of response by independent assessment. Off treatment indicates one patient who discontinued treatment due to an adverse event but remained in follow-up for tumor assessment until data cutoff. All other patients either discontinued treatment due to progressive disease or death, or remained on treatment until data cutoff. aPatients not in the evaluable set. The evaluable set, used for sensitivity analyses, comprised all patients in the as-treated population with centrally confirmed HGG through histology, centrally confirmed positive BRAF V600 mutation status, adequate tumor assessment at baseline, and a follow-up tumor assessment ≥8 weeks after starting treatment (unless disease progression was observed before that time) or had discontinued for any reason. CR, complete response; HGG, high-grade glioma; NR, not reached; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Progression-free survival by independent assessment. aOnly includes patients who died without known disease progression.

Comment in

References

    1. Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H, et al. : CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016. Neuro Oncol 21:v1-v100, 2019. (suppl 5) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ostrom QT, de Blank PM, Kruchko C, et al. : Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation: Infant and childhood primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. Neuro Oncol 16:x1-x36, 2015. (suppl 10) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bavle A, Chintagumpala M: Pediatric high-grade glioma: A review of biology, prognosis, and treatment. J Radiat Oncol 7:7-15, 2018
    1. Chatwin HV, Cruz Cruz J, Green AL: Pediatric high-grade glioma: Moving toward subtype-specific multimodal therapy. FEBS J 288:6127-6141, 2021 - PubMed
    1. Lashford LS, Thiesse P, Jouvet A, et al. : Temozolomide in malignant gliomas of childhood: A United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group and French Society for Pediatric Oncology Intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 20:4684-4691, 2002 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data