Link between the referring physician and breast and cervical cancers screening: a cross-sectional study in France
- PMID: 37644404
- PMCID: PMC10464303
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02122-5
Link between the referring physician and breast and cervical cancers screening: a cross-sectional study in France
Abstract
Background: The aims of the "médecin traitant" or referring physician (RP) reform, introduced in France in 2004, were to improve the organisation and quality of care and to allow for greater equity, particularly in terms of prevention. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of having a declared RP on the uptake of screening for breast and cervical cancers, and to explore the mechanisms involved.
Methods: We used an existing dataset of 1,072,289 women, which combines data from the Health Insurance information systems, with census data. We built multivariable logistic regression models to study the effect of having a RP on the uptake of mammography and pap smear, adjusted for age, socio-economic level, health status and healthcare provision. We secondarily added to this model the variable "having consulted a General Practitioner (GP) within the year". Finally, we evaluated the interaction between the effect of having a referring physician and the area of residence (metropolitan/urban/rural).
Results: Patients who had a declared RP had a significantly higher uptake of mammography and pap smear than those who did not. The strength of the association was particularly important in very urban areas. The effect of having visited a GP seemed to explain a part of the correlation between having a RP and uptake of screening.
Conclusions: Lower rates of gynaecological screening among women without an RP compared to those with an RP may partly reflect a specific behaviour pattern in women less adherent to the health care system. However, this result also shows the importance of the RP, who assumes the key role of relaying public health information in a more personalised and adapted way.
Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Continuity of patient care; Early detection of cancer; General practitioners; Socioeconomic factors; Uterine cervical neoplasms.
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Social and territorial inequalities in breast and cervical cancers screening uptake: a cross-sectional study in France.BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 22;12(2):e055363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055363. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35193917 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with Pap smear screening among French women visiting a general practitioner in the Rhône-Alpes region.Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2013 Oct;61(5):437-45. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Sep 5. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2013. PMID: 24012357
-
To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.Cancer Causes Control. 2014 Aug;25(8):977-83. doi: 10.1007/s10552-014-0397-z. Epub 2014 May 20. Cancer Causes Control. 2014. PMID: 24842393
-
Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006.BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 19;10:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-146. BMC Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20302614 Free PMC article.
-
General practitioners may improve cervical screening equality in France.BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):2748. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18942-8. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39385183 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Do women with a history of breast cancer recommend risk-based breast cancer screening? An in-depth interview study.Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 22;16:1414099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414099. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40330299 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal Evolution and Associated Factors of Adherence to Mammography Screening among Women in Spain: Results from Two National Health Surveys (2017-2020).Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;11(22):2934. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11222934. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37998426 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barnay T, Hartmann L, Ulmann P. Réforme du « médecin traitant » et nouveaux enjeux de la médecine de ville en France. Revue francaise des affaires sociales. 2007;1:109–126. doi: 10.3917/rfas.071.0109. - DOI
-
- Dourgnon P, Jusot F, Sermet C, Silva J. Les assurés et le médecin traitant : premier bilan après la réforme. Issues in health economics. 2009;(146):1–6.
-
- ESPS 2014 - enquête santé protection sociale - Avez-vous déclaré un médecin traitant à la Sécurité Sociale ? [Internet]. Available from: https://www.irdes.fr/recherche/enquetes/esps-enquete-sur-la-sante-et-la-....
-
- Allen DJ, Heyrman J. Définition européenne de la Médecine Générale - médecine de famille. Wonca. 2002;52.