Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 29;22(1):228.
doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01962-w.

Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents in patients with diabetes versus non-diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents in patients with diabetes versus non-diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

Hong Wang et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: Today, diabetes mellitus (DM) has become a worldwide concern. DM is a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Eligible patients with CVD are treated invasively by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) whereby a stent is implanted inside the coronary vessel with the particular lesion to allow sufficient blood flow. Newer scientific research have shown that even though associated with a lower rate of re-stenosis, first-generation drug eluting stents (DES) were associated with a higher rate of late stent thrombosis. Recently, newer stents, namely biodegradable polymer DES (BP-DES) have been developed to overcome the safety issues of earlier generation DES. In this analysis we aimed to systematically compare the long term (≥ 12 months) adverse cardiovascular outcomes observed in DM versus non-DM patients who were implanted with BP-DES.

Methods: Cochrane central, MEDLINE (Subset PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, http://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov and Google scholar were searched for relevant publications involving BP-DES in patients with DM versus non-DM and their associated adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The mean follow-up time period ranged from 12 to 120 months. Data analysis was carried out with the latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.4). Based on the Mantel-Haenszel test, risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and used to represent the results following analysis.

Results: Seven (7) studies with a total number of 10,246 participants were included in this analysis. Stents which were implanted during PCI were BP-DES. Participants were enrolled from the year 2006 to 2013. Our current results showed that in patients who were implanted with BP-DES, the risks of major adverse cardiac events (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.18-1.43; P = 0.00001), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.14-1.93; P = 0.003), all-cause mortality (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.29-2.23; P = 0.0002), cardiac death (RR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.28-2.93; P = 0.002), target vessel revascularization (RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.77; P = 0.03), target lesion revascularization (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.07-1.54; P = 0.007) and target lesion failure (RR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.52-2.12; P = 0.00001) were significantly higher in the DM group. Definite and probable stent thrombosis (RR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.28-2.55; P = 0.0009) were also significantly higher in the DM group.

Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus was an independent risk factor associated with long term adverse cardiovascular outcomes following PCI with BP-DES.

Keywords: Biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents; Cardiovascular diseases; Diabetes mellitus; Durable polymer drug eluting stents; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Revascularization; Stent thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram showing the study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Major adverse cardiac events and myocardial infarction observed with BP-DES in patients with versus without DM
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cardiovascular outcomes observed with BP-DES in patients with versus without DM
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Repeated revascularization observed with BP-DES in patients with versus without DM
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Stent thrombosis observed with BP-DES in patients with versus without DM
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Funnel plot showing publication bias (A)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Funnel plot showing publication bias (B)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Funnel plot showing publication bias (C)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Khan MAbdulB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H. Juma Al Kaabi. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes - global burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10(1):107–11. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ma C-X, Ma X-N, Guan C-H, Li Y-D. Dídac Mauricio, Song-Bo Fu. Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: progress toward personalized management. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01516-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fiorentino TV, Prioletta A, Zuo P, Folli F. Hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress and its role in diabetes mellitus related cardiovascular diseases. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(32):5695–703. doi: 10.2174/1381612811319320005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raminderjit Kaur M, Kaur J, Singh Endothelial dysfunction and platelet hyperactivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: molecular insights and therapeutic strategies. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0763-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tamim, Akbari Rasha Al-Lamee. Percutaneous coronary intervention in Multi-Vessel Disease. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022;44:80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.06.254. - DOI - PubMed