Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review
- PMID: 37644795
- PMCID: PMC10614113
- DOI: 10.2174/1381612829666230830105740
Risk Prediction Models and Novel Prognostic Factors for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic and Comprehensive Review
Abstract
Background: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have large individual differences, unclear risk stratification, and imperfect treatment plans. Risk prediction models are helpful for the dynamic assessment of patients' prognostic risk and early intensive therapy of high-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to systematically summarize the existing risk prediction models and novel prognostic factors for HFpEF, to provide a reference for the construction of convenient and efficient HFpEF risk prediction models.
Methods: Studies on risk prediction models and prognostic factors for HFpEF were systematically searched in relevant databases including PubMed and Embase. The retrieval time was from inception to February 1, 2023. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. The predictive value of risk prediction models for end outcomes was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve, C-statistic, C-index, etc. In the literature screening process, potential novel prognostic factors with high value were explored.
Results: A total of 21 eligible HFpEF risk prediction models and 22 relevant studies were included. Except for 2 studies with a high risk of bias and 2 studies with a moderate risk of bias, other studies that proposed risk prediction models had a low risk of bias overall. Potential novel prognostic factors for HFpEF were classified and described in terms of demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race), lifestyle (physical activity, body mass index, weight change, and smoking history), laboratory tests (biomarkers), physical inspection (blood pressure, electrocardiogram, imaging examination), and comorbidities.
Conclusion: It is of great significance to explore the potential novel prognostic factors of HFpEF and build a more convenient and efficient risk prediction model for improving the overall prognosis of patients. This review can provide a substantial reference for further research.
Keywords: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; biomarkers; dynamic assessment; prognostic factor; risk prediction model; risk stratification.
Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Liver biomarkers as predictors of prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04647-2. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025. PMID: 40175926 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Significance of Serum Cholinesterase Level in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry.J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e014100. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014100. Epub 2019 Dec 18. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. PMID: 31847660 Free PMC article.
-
The prognostic value of highly sensitive cardiac troponin assays for adverse events in men and women with stable heart failure and a preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction.Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;19(12):1638-1647. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.911. Epub 2017 Aug 28. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017. PMID: 28849609
-
Prognostic benefit of early diagnosis with exercise stress testing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Jul 12;30(9):902-911. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad127. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37094815
-
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of current biomarkers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Dec;114(12):793-804. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 19. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2021. PMID: 34802963
References
-
- Higgins J., Thomas J. Cochrane. 2020. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical