A randomized controlled trial of sequential vs simultaneous use of Foley balloon catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor in nulliparous pregnant women
- PMID: 37645648
- PMCID: PMC10461236
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100252
A randomized controlled trial of sequential vs simultaneous use of Foley balloon catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor in nulliparous pregnant women
Abstract
Background: Although recent evidence suggests the simultaneous approach use of oxytocin for induction of labor in nullipara, there is limited data from low-income settings that support this.
Objective: This study aimed to determine whether induction of labor with simultaneous use of oxytocin and a Foley balloon catheter decreases the induction of labor to delivery interval in nulliparous women, compared with sequential use of a Foley balloon catheter followed by oxytocin.
Study design: This was a randomized controlled trial of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies presenting for induction of labor at >28 weeks of gestation at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). The participants were randomly assigned to either the simultaneous group (the use of oxytocin and a Foley balloon catheter for induction of labor) or the sequential group (overnight intracervical Foley balloon catheter placement followed by the use of oxytocin the next morning). The primary outcome was induction of labor to delivery interval. Comparisons between the groups were made using the Student t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test and chi-square test on Stata (version 15; StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX). This study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (identifier: PACTR201709002509200).
Results: From November 2019 to March 2020, a total of 140 women were randomly assigned to the simultaneous group (70 women) or the sequential group (70 women). The median oxytocin initiation to delivery intervals were 6.09 hours (range, 4.03-10.7) in the sequential group and 8.1 hours (range, 4.7-11.6) in the simultaneous group (P=.46). The mean Foley balloon catheter insertion to delivery intervals were 16.09±5.7 hours in the sequential group and 8.06±4.2 hours in the simultaneous group (P<.001). Cesarean delivery rate, composite neonatal outcomes, and chorioamnionitis were not different between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: In nulliparous pregnant women, induction of labor using the simultaneous approach did not shorten the oxytocin initiation to delivery interval compared with the sequential approach. Moreover, both approaches showed no difference in the rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Keywords: FOIL-N; Foley balloon catheter; induction in Ethiopia; induction of labor; simultaneous vs sequential Foley and oxytocin.
© 2023 The Authors.
References
-
- Sciscione AC, McCullough H, Manley JS, Shlossman PA, Pollock M, Colmorgen GH. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:55–60. - PubMed
-
- Keirse MJ, Thiery M, Parewijck W, Mitchell MD. Chronic stimulation of uterine prostaglandin synthesis during cervical ripening before the onset of labor. Prostaglandins. 1983;25:671–682. - PubMed
-
- Manabe Y, Manabe A, Takahashi A. F prostaglandin levels in amniotic fluid during balloon-induced cervical softening and labor at term. Prostaglandins. 1982;23:247–256. - PubMed
-
- Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ. Cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:18–23. - PubMed
-
- Ekele BA, Isah AY. Cervical ripening: how long can the Foley catheter safely remain in the cervical canal? Afr J Reprod Health. 2002;6:98–102. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources