Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 14:11:1136210.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1136210. eCollection 2023.

Why district assemblies disburse resources to district health systems for service delivery at district level in the context of decentralization: a comparative study of two districts in the Volta Region of Ghana

Affiliations

Why district assemblies disburse resources to district health systems for service delivery at district level in the context of decentralization: a comparative study of two districts in the Volta Region of Ghana

Andrews Ayim et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore why the District Assembly disburses financial and other resources to the District Health System.

Design: Multiple case study with a single unit of analysis (holistic) using quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection involving a desk review, analysis of routine health management information system data and key informant interviews.

Setting: Two districts in the Volta Region of Ghana.

Participants: Twelve key officials of each district assembly and the district health system (24 total) who had worked in the district at least a year or more.

Interventions: None.

Results: Both District Assemblies had moderate decision space which was influenced by their capacity, power and contextual factors like politics, economics, legal and situational factors. Disbursement of financial and other resources to the District Health Systems was influenced by financial capacity, use of power by stakeholders, context and the decision space of the District Assembly. Political actors appeared to have more power in resource disbursement decision making than community members and technocrats in a context of resource constraints and inadequate funding. The funding available was used predominantly for capital investments, mainly construction of Community Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) compounds.

Conclusion: It is important to make policies that will regulate the relative power among the political appointees like the District Chief Executives (DCEs), public and civil servants in decentralized departments and agencies and Community members to make resource disbursement more sensitive to communities and decentralized departments.

Keywords: decentralization; devolution; district assemblies; district health systems; financial disbursement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between local government and Ghana health sector in Ghana’s decentralization.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Contextual framework of factors influencing the disbursement of financial and other resources by the district assembly to the district health system.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The ‘power cube’- The levels, spaces and forms of power (Reference: finding the spaces for change: a power analysis. IDS bulletin volume 37 No 6. November 2006. Institute of development studies).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Total revenue inflows and the inflows by source for the two districts over the five-year period 2013–2018.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ketu south municipal and central Tongu district revenue sources from 2013 to 2018.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Percentage of budget received by district A and district B from 2013 to 2018.

References

    1. Crawford G. ‘Making democracy a reality’? The politics of decentralisation and the limits to local democracy in Ghana. J Contemp African Stud. (2009) 27:57–83. doi: 10.1080/02589000802576699 - DOI
    1. Bossert T. Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance. Soc Sci Med. (1998) 47:1513–27. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00234-2, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ribot JC. Choice, recognition and the democracy effects of decentralization. Visby, Sweden: ICLD Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy (2011).
    1. Yilmaz S, Beris Y, Serrano-Berthet R. Linking local government discretion and accountability in decentralisation. Dev Policy Rev. (2010) 28:259–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00484.x - DOI
    1. Heywood P, Harahap NP. Public funding of health at the district level in Indonesia after decentralization - sources, flows and contradictions. Heal Res Policy Syst. (2009) 7:1–14. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources