Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Jul-Dec;16(10):793-801.
doi: 10.1080/17474086.2023.2247160. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A: interim results from a phase 3, prospective, multicenter, open-label study

Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A: interim results from a phase 3, prospective, multicenter, open-label study

Robert F Sidonio Jr et al. Expert Rev Hematol. 2023 Jul-Dec.
Free article

Erratum in

  • Correction.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Expert Rev Hematol. 2024 Jan-Mar;17(1-3):101. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2024.2301823. Epub 2024 Jan 10. Expert Rev Hematol. 2024. PMID: 38198247 No abstract available.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A (HA).

Methods: This prospective, phase 3 study (NCT02615691) was conducted in PUPs, or patients with ≤2 exposure days (EDs) prior to screening, aged <6 years with severe HA. The primary endpoint was incidence of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor development. This protocol-specified interim analysis was conducted after 50 patients had completed ≥50 EDs without developing FVIII inhibitors or had developed a confirmed inhibitor at any time.

Results: Of the enrolled patients, 59/80 (73.8%) received ≥1 dose of rurioctocog alfa pegol; 54 received prophylaxis, and 35 on-demand treatment. Incidence of inhibitor development was 0.19 (10/52). Total annualized bleeding rate (95% CIs) was 3.2 (2.0-5.0) for patients receiving prophylaxis and 3.2 (1.6-6.3) for on-demand treatment. Hemostatic efficacy of most bleedings was rated as 'excellent' or 'good' after 24 hours (122/131 [93.1%]) and at resolution (161/170 [94.7%]). Five patients received ≥1 dose of rurioctocog alfa pegol for immune tolerance induction (ITI) and 1 patient was defined as having ITI success. Thirteen patients experienced 14 treatment-related adverse events, including 10 cases of FVIII inhibitor development.

Conclusion: This is the first prospective study of rurioctocog alfa pegol for the treatment of PUPs with severe HA.

Trial registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT02615691).

Keywords: Antibodies; factor VIII; hemophilia A; inhibitors; prophylaxis; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Associated data