Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Mar;281(3):1175-1183.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08197-1. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

Digital live imaging of intraoperative electrocochleography during cochlear implantation: the first 50 patients

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Digital live imaging of intraoperative electrocochleography during cochlear implantation: the first 50 patients

Benedikt Höing et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Real-time visualization of intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG) potentials via a digital microscope during cochlear implantation can provide direct feedback during electrode insertion. The aim of this prospective, randomized study of 50 patients was to obtain long-term data with a focus on residual hearing preservation and speech understanding.

Material and methods: Cochlear implantations were performed in 50 patients (26 female, 24 male) with residual hearing using a digital microscope. Patients were randomized into two groups. Intraoperative ECochG potentials were either displayed directly in the surgeon's field of view (picture-in-picture display, PiP) or not directly in the field of view (without picture-in-picture display, without PiP). Residual hearing preservation and speech comprehension were recorded within a 1-year follow-up period, compared between groups (PiP versus without PiP) and to a control group of 26 patients implanted without ECochG.

Results: Mean insertion time was significantly longer in the picture-in-picture group (p = 0.025). Residual hearing preservation after 6 weeks at 250 Hz was significantly better in the picture-in-picture group (p = 0.017). After one year, 76% of patients showed residual hearing in the picture-in-picture group (62% without picture-in-picture technique, p = n.s.). Use of the picture-in-picture technique resulted in better long-term pure tone residual hearing preservation at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz. Speech intelligibility improved by 46% in the picture-in-picture group (38% without picture-in-picture).

Discussion: This study is the first to describe long-term results in a large cohort of cochlear implant patients in whom digital visualization of intraoperative ECochG was used. Our results show that visualization of intraoperative ECochG has a positive effect on residual hearing preservation.

Keywords: Cochlear implantation; Digital microscopic imaging; Hearing preservation; Intraoperative electrocochleography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This research was funded through a grant provided by Cochlear Research & Development Ltd under reference number IIR-2324.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intraoperative setting. Center of the intraoperative setting is the digital microscope. During electrode insertion, residual hearing is monitored by ECochG potentials measured as Cochlear microphonics which are transferred via a video converter from a laptop to the digital microscope and visualized in the top right corner in the surgeon’s field of view. Patients´ CT scans are displayed in the top left corner. Postoperative control for correct intracochlear positioning of the electrode is performed with C-arm X-ray-unit (left side)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Residual hearing preservation over a 1-year follow-up-period. In the picture-in-picture group, the percentage of patients with residual hearing ranged from 96% 6 weeks postoperatively to 76% at the end of the follow-up period. In the without picture-in-picture group, 62% of patients showed residual hearing at the end of the follow-up period. Differences between groups were significant 6 weeks postoperatively (Chi-Square test, p = 0.017, chi = 8.08). At 3 months (p = 0.64, chi = 0.21), 6 months (p = 0.69, chi = 0.15) and 12 months (p = 0.46, chi = 0.52) postoperatively, no significant differences between groups were detected
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results of AGF over a 1-year follow-up period. In the tested frequencies (250, 500 and 1000 Hz), AGF-results of the PiP-group showed a slightly better hearing threshold than the without PiP-group without reaching statistical significance (intraoperative: 250 Hz: p = 0.46, z = 0.74; 500 Hz: p = 0.83, z =  − 0,21; 1000 Hz: p = 0.27, z = 1.09, 6 weeks: 250 Hz: p = 0.55, z = 0.59; 500 Hz: p = 0.35, z = 0.93; 1000 Hz: p = 0.43, z = 0.78, 3 months: 250 Hz: p = 0.83, z = 0.21; 500 Hz: p = 0.18, z = 0.32; 1000 Hz: p = 0.31, z = 1.01, 6 months: 250 Hz: p = 0.29, z = 1.05; 500 Hz: p = 0.45, z = 0.75; 1000 Hz: p = 0.16, z = 1.39, 12 months: 250 Hz: p = 0.35, z = 0.93; 500 Hz: p = 0.39, z = 0.84; 1000 Hz: p = 0.24, z = 1.16)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pure tone thresholds and AGF over a 1-year follow-up period in patients with intraoperative ECochG- and without (regular implantation). At 250 Hz, AGF results differ significantly from pure tone thresholds over the follow-up period (6 weeks: p < 0.01, z = 3.61; 3 months: p < 0.01, z = 3.72; 6 months: p < 0.01, z = 5.4; 12 months: p = 0.04, z = 2.04). At 500 Hz (6 weeks: p = 1, z = 0; 3 months: p < 0.1, z = 1.61; 6 months: p = 0.01, z = 2.5; 12 months: p = 0.32, z = 0.97) and 1000 Hz (6 weeks: p = 0.5, z = 0.6; 3 months: p < 0.24, z =  − 1.1; 6 months: p = 0.05, z = 1.9; 12 months: p = 0.76, z = 0.29), a significant difference was detected only after 6 months. Residual hearing preservation is non-significantly better in patients implanted with intraoperative ECochG compared to the control group of patients implanted regularly without ECochG, especially at 1000 Hz (pre/intraoperative: 250 Hz: p = 0.53, z =  − 0.62; 500 Hz: p < 0.77, z =  − 0.29; 1000 Hz: p = 0.4, z = 0.83; 3 months: 250 Hz: p = 0.23, z =  − 1.19; 500 Hz: p = 0.69, z = 0.39; 1000 Hz: p = 0.59, z = 0.53)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Speech understanding tested with Freiburger monosyllables before (best-aided condition) and after implantation. A significant improvement in speech understanding after one year compared to preoperative results was detected in both groups (PiP: p < 0.01, z =  − 3.72; wPiP: p = 0.017, z =  − 2.39) without a significant difference between groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li H, Schart-Moren N, Rohani SA, et al. Synchrotron radiation-based reconstruction of the human spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implantation. Ear Hear. 2020;41(1):173–181. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000738. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teschendorf M, Arweiler-Harbeck D, Bagus H. Speech development after cochlear implantation in children with bilingual parents. Cochlear Implants Int. 2010;11(Suppl 1):386–389. doi: 10.1179/146701010X12671177990190. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holman MA, Carlson ML, Driscoll CL, et al. Cochlear implantation in children 12 months of age and younger. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(2):251–258. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827d0922. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buchsenschutz K, Arnolds J, Bagus H, et al. Surgical risk profile and audiological outcome in the elderly after cochlea-implantation. Laryngorhinootologie. 2015;94(10):670–675. - PubMed
    1. Zeitler DM, Sladen DP, DeJong MD, et al. Cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness in children and adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;118:128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.037. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding