Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;56(3):1129-1135.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03761-4. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

Efficacy and safety of removing peritoneal dialysis catheters using the pull technique

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of removing peritoneal dialysis catheters using the pull technique

Lina Zhang et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To study the efficacy and safety of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter removal using the pull technique.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 36 patients in whom the pull technique was used to remove a PD catheter. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and health economic benefits of this technique by analyzing the pain score, duration of the procedure, complications during or after the procedure, and cost.

Results: The mean age (± standard deviation) of the 36 patients was 51 ± 14 years involving 27 males and 9 females with a mean body mass index was 23.4 ± 2.6. The mean duration of PD was 28 months (range 4-96 months). The site of the pull technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter removal was at the bedside or in the treatment room, with local anesthesia or no anesthesia. The mean duration of the procedure (from anesthesia to complete removal of the PD catheter) was 5-15 min. Only one patient experienced catheter rupture and no patients developed procedural or post-procedural bleeding or abdominal wall leakage. Infection did not occur at the inner or outer cuffs, tunnel, or outlet. Pain scores analyzed by a 10-point visual analogue scoring technique both immediately and 24 h after the procedure were 3.5 ± 1.7 and 1.2 ± 0.8, respectively.

Conclusions: The pull technique is simple to perform, takes a short time, results in few complications and small wounds, causes only mild pain, enables fast recovery, and results in low medical costs.

Keywords: Catheter removal; Peritoneal dialysis; Peritoneal dialysis catheter; Pull technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Ash SR (2003) Interventional nephrology and dialysis: chronic peritoneal dialysis catheters: overview of design, placement, and removal procedures. Semin Dial 16:323–334. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-139x.2003.16062.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korzets Z, Hasdan G, Bulkan G, Klein E, Bernheim J, Shpitz B (2000) Early postoperative complications of removal of Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter. Perit Dial Int 20:789–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/089686080002000636 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crabtree JH, Shrestha BM, Chow K-M, Figueiredo AE, Povlsen JV, Wilkie M, Abdel-Aal A, Cullis B, Goh B-L, Briggs VR, Brown EA, Dor FJMF (2019) Creating and maintaining optimal peritoneal dialysis access in the adult patient: 2019 update. Perit Dial Int 39:414–436. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2018.00232 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quiroga IM, Baboo R, Lord RH, Darby CR (2001) Tenckhoff catheters post-renal transplantation: the ‘pull’ technique? Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:2079–2081. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/16.10.2079 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hakim NS, Pirenne J, Benedetti E, Matas AJ (1995) A technique of removal of the Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter. J Am Coll Surg 180:350–352 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources