Histological Comparison of Nanofat and Lipoconcentrate: Enhanced Effects of Lipoconcentrate on Adipogenesis and Angiogenesis
- PMID: 37648930
- DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03583-w
Histological Comparison of Nanofat and Lipoconcentrate: Enhanced Effects of Lipoconcentrate on Adipogenesis and Angiogenesis
Abstract
Background: Nanofat and lipoconcentrate contain adipose-derived stem cells and growth factors, and have wide clinical applications in the regenerative field. This study aimed to investigate the microenvironmental changes associated with nanofat and lipoconcentrate.
Methods: Conventional fat, nanofat, or lipoconcentrate (0.2 mL each, n = 5 per group) were injected subcutaneously into the dorsal flanks of athymic nude mice. The graft weights were measured at postoperative week 4; the grafts and their overlying skin were used for histological analyses.
Results: Weights of the lipoconcentrate grafts were significantly greater than those of the conventional fat (p < 0.05) and nanofat (p < 0.01) grafts. There was no significant difference in inflammation, oil cysts, and fibrosis between the conventional fat and nanofat groups. Histological examination of the lipoconcentrate grafts showed less macrophage infiltration and the formation of fibrosis and oil cysts. Additionally, adipogenesis and angiogenesis were induced more in the lipoconcentrate grafts than in the nanofat grafts (p < 0.01). Lipoconcentrate and nanofat improved dermal thickness (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively, versus the baseline).
Conclusion: Lipoconcentrate grafts had greater volume and shape retention than conventional fat and nanofat grafts. They had better histological structure and acted as scaffolds for adipogenesis and angiogenesis. Both products showed regenerative effects on dermal thickness; however, only lipoconcentrate grafts had the required volume and regenerative effects, allowing it to serve as a novel adipose-free grafting method for facial rejuvenation and contouring.
No level assigned: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Keywords: Adipogenesis; Angiogenesis; Lipoconcentrate; Nanofat; Regenerative effects.
© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Injectable Acellular Adipose Matrix on Soft Tissue Reconstruction in a Murine Model.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Jun;48(11):2210-2219. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03924-3. Epub 2024 Mar 18. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 38499876 Free PMC article.
-
Exosomes Derived from Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Cannot Distinctively Promote Graft Survival in Cryopreservation Fat Grafting.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Oct;47(5):2117-2129. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03457-1. Epub 2023 Jul 3. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 37400586
-
Enrichment of Fat Graft with Association of ASC and Nanofat in an Animal Model.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Feb;49(3):908-916. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04322-5. Epub 2024 Oct 14. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 39402194
-
Regenerative Cells For Facial Surgery: Biofilling and Biocontouring.Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jul 1;37(suppl_3):S16-S32. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx078. Aesthet Surg J. 2017. PMID: 29025218 Review.
-
Microfat and Lipoconcentrate for the Treatment of Facial Scars.Clin Plast Surg. 2020 Jan;47(1):139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Oct 21. Clin Plast Surg. 2020. PMID: 31739890 Review.
Cited by
-
Letter on Histological Comparison of Nanofat and Lipoconcentrate: Enhanced Effects of Lipoconcentrate on Adipogenesis and Angiogenesis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Apr;49(7):2165-2166. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04171-2. Epub 2024 Jun 12. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 38864898 No abstract available.
-
The Influence of Sedimentation on the Composition of the Lipoaspirate and the Effects on Further Mechanical Processing.Cells. 2025 Apr 16;14(8):601. doi: 10.3390/cells14080601. Cells. 2025. PMID: 40277926 Free PMC article.
-
Bayesian reconstruction of rapidly scanned mid-infrared optoacoustic signals enables fast, label-free chemical microscopy.Sci Adv. 2025 Aug 22;11(34):eadu7319. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu7319. Epub 2025 Aug 22. Sci Adv. 2025. PMID: 40845115 Free PMC article.
-
Histology and Immunohistochemistry of Adipose Tissue: A Scoping Review on Staining Methods and Their Informative Value.Cells. 2025 Jun 14;14(12):898. doi: 10.3390/cells14120898. Cells. 2025. PMID: 40558526 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Coleman SR (2006) Structural fat grafting: more than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000234610.81672.e7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gentile P, Piccinno M, Calabrese C (2019) Characteristics and potentiality of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) obtained from enzymatic digestion of fat graft. Cells 8:282. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8030282 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Jeyaraman M, Muthu S, Sharma S et al (2021) Nanofat: a therapeutic paradigm in regenerative medicine. World J Stem Cells 13:1733–1746. https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v13.i11.1733 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Atiyeh B, Ghieh F, Oneisi A (2021) Nanofat cell-mediated anti-aging therapy: evidence-based analysis of efficacy and an update of stem cell facelift. Aesthetic Plast Surg 45:2939–2947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02353-w - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources