Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):293.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02250-6.

Effect of preoperative oral rehydration before cesarean section on ultrasound assessment of gastric volume and intraoperative hemodynamic changes: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of preoperative oral rehydration before cesarean section on ultrasound assessment of gastric volume and intraoperative hemodynamic changes: a randomized controlled trial

Eriko Ijiri et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section often requires an urgent transfusion load due to decreased blood pressure after spinal anesthesia. This prospective randomized study aimed to investigate whether a preoperative oral rehydration solution (ORS) stabilized perioperative circulatory dynamics.

Methods: Sixty-three parturients scheduled for cesarean section under combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Group O received 500 mL ORS before bedtime and 500 mL 2 h before CSEA; Group M received mineral water instead of ORS; and Group C had no fluid intake (controls). After entering the operating room, stomach size was measured using ultrasound. Blood samples were obtained, and CSEA was induced. Vasopressors were administered when systolic blood pressure was < 90 mmHg or decreased by > 20%. As a vasopressor, phenylephrine (0.1 mg) was administered at ≥ 60 beats/min heart rate or ephedrine (5 mg) at < 60 beats/min heart rate. The primary outcome was the total number of vasopressor boluses administered. Secondary outcomes were the cross-sectional area of the stomach antrum, maternal plasma glucose levels, serum sodium levels, total intravenous fluid, bleeding volume, urine volume, operative time, and cord blood gas values after delivery.

Results: The total number of vasopressor boluses was lower in Group O than in Group C (P < 0.05). Group O had lower total dose of phenylephrine than Group C (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between Group M and other groups. No differences were detected regarding secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: In women scheduled for cesarean section, preoperative ORS stabilized perioperative circulatory dynamics. Neither ORS nor mineral water consumption increased the stomach content volume.

Trial registration: This trial is registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000019825: Date of registration 17/11/2015).

Keywords: Cesarean section; Gastric volume; Oral rehydration therapy; Preoperative fasting; Preoperative management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ultrasonographic image of the gastric antrum The figure demonstrates two perpendicular diameters, line 1 and line 2, for cross-sectional area of the stomach antrum Line 1: Craniocaudal antral diameter Line 2: Anteroposterior antral diameter L, liver; F, fetal head
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT flow diagram of study recruitment CSA, cross-sectional area
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The total number of vasopressor boluses after inducing combined spinal epidural anesthesia. The probability was calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks. A pairwise comparison was performed using Dunn’s test if the Kruskal–Wallis test was significant *Group O < Group C n.s., not significant
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The total dose of phenylephrine after inducing combined spinal epidural anesthesia. The probability was calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks. A pairwise comparison was performed using Dunn’s test if the Kruskal–Wallis test was significant **Group O < Group C n.s., not significant

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rocke DA, Rout CC. Volume preloading, spinal hypotension and caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1995;75:257–9. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.3.257. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butwick AJ, Columb MO, Carvalho B. Preventing spinal hypotension during caesarean delivery: what is the latest? Br J Anaesth. 2015;114:183–6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu267. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:466–77. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chooi C, Cox JJ, Lumb RS, Middleton P, Chemali M, Emmett RS, et al. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7:CD002251. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitzgerald JP, Fedoruk KA, Jadin SM, Carvalho B, Halpern SH. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:109–21. doi: 10.1111/anae.14841. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data