Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9
- PMID: 37649750
- PMCID: PMC10465026
- DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_9_23
Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9
Abstract
Background: Case finding for low mood is essential in primary care, but it is time-consuming using current depression inventories. The Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) is a short, simple inventory which assesses mood for today, and we aimed to validate it in this study.
Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with emotional distress seen in a single primary care clinic by one of the authors over 22 months were eligible for this retrospective audit (N = 160). Multiple visits (N = 421) from the same patient were included in the study. The index test was BDST, which assesses the patient's mood for today. The reference standard was the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which assesses mood over the past 2 weeks. PHQ-9 had a cut-off point of ≥10 and BDST had a cut-off point of ≥6 for a significant mood issue.
Results: The median age of patients was 35 years, and 63% of the cohort were women. The median BDST score was 8, indicative of moderately low mood, and the median PHQ-9 score was 15, indicative of moderately severe depression. For patients with a BDST score ≥6, the likelihood ratio of a positive test was 2.67. The sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%-96%) and the specificity was 68% (95% CI: 60%-76%). The area under the curve was 84% (95% CI: 80%-87%).
Conclusion: This audit validates BDST against PHQ-9 and finds it an excellent case-finding tool compared to PHQ-9. This is the first validation study of BDST.
Keywords: Case finding; depression; primary care; sensitivity; specificity; validate.
Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Emoqol-100: Development and validation of a single question for low mood in primary care. A retrospective audit.BJGP Open. 2023 Sep 19;7(3):BJGPO.2023.0011. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0011. Print 2023 Sep. BJGP Open. 2023. PMID: 37160336 Free PMC article.
-
Emoqol 100, an ultra ultra-brief mood case-finding tool: A diagnostic accuracy study.J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Oct;10(10):3590-3594. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_40_21. Epub 2021 Nov 5. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021. PMID: 34934651 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a screening tool for depression in pregnant women: Afaan Oromo version.PLoS One. 2018 Feb 6;13(2):e0191782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191782. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29408928 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying depression with the PHQ-2: A diagnostic meta-analysis.J Affect Disord. 2016 Oct;203:382-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 6. J Affect Disord. 2016. PMID: 27371907
-
Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening to detect major depression: updated systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.BMJ. 2021 Oct 5;375:n2183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2183. BMJ. 2021. PMID: 34610915 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organisation. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders Global Health Estimates. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services; 2017. Available from:https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254610/W?sequence=1 .
-
- Malhi GS, Bell E, Boyce P, Bassett D, Berk M, Bryant RR, et al. The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders:Bipolar disorder summary. Bipolar Disord. 2020;22:805–21. - PubMed
-
- El-Den S, Chen TF, Gan Y-L, Wong E, O'Reilly CL. The psychometric properties of depression screening tools in primary healthcare settings:A systematic review. J Affect Disorder. 2018;225:503–22. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous