Acute Effects of Different Set Configurations on Neuromuscular, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses in Young Women
- PMID: 37649783
- PMCID: PMC10464756
- DOI: 10.70252/MWXB1638
Acute Effects of Different Set Configurations on Neuromuscular, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses in Young Women
Abstract
We compared neuromuscular, metabolic, and perceptual responses between different resistance training configurations in young women. In a counterbalanced randomized order, 13 young women performed the following protocols in separate sessions (sets x repetitions): traditional (TRAD): 5x10, 90-s of rest interval between sets; more frequent and shorter total rest (FSR): 10x5, 30-s of rest interval between sets. The sessions were composed of leg press exercise with the same intensity. Force (maximum voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC]) and metabolic (lactate concentration) responses were measured pre- and post-resistance training sessions. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was measured after each set. The internal training load was calculated using the session-RPE method. There was a significant reduction in the MVIC only after TRAD configuration (Effect size [ES] = 0.36). The lactate concentration increased in both conditions but was higher after TRAD (ES = 2.81) than FSR (ES = 1.23). The RPE has progressively increased in both configurations. On the other hand, the internal training load was lower in the FSR configuration. From our findings, we suggest that more frequent and shorter total rest is an effective strategy for maintaining the ability to produce force, generating less metabolic stress and lower perceived internal load in young women.
Keywords: Strength training; cluster set; fatigability; force; intra-set rest; neuromuscular function.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Effect of Traditional, Cluster, and Rest Redistribution Set Configurations on Neuromuscular and Perceptual Responses During Strength-Oriented Resistance Training.J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jun 1;36(6):1490-1497. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003658. Epub 2020 Jun 17. J Strength Cond Res. 2022. PMID: 32569130
-
Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Acute Responses to Different Set Configurations in Full Squat.J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jun;34(6):1581-1590. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002117. J Strength Cond Res. 2020. PMID: 28700515 Clinical Trial.
-
Acute Mechanical, Neuromuscular, and Metabolic Responses to Different Set Configurations in Resistance Training.J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Nov 1;36(11):2983-2991. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004068. Epub 2021 Jun 15. J Strength Cond Res. 2022. PMID: 34132222
-
Mechanical and Metabolic Responses to Traditional and Cluster Set Configurations in the Bench Press Exercise.J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Mar;34(3):663-670. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002301. J Strength Cond Res. 2020. PMID: 29076963 Clinical Trial.
-
Acute Effects of Cluster and Rest Redistribution Set Structures on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Fatigue During and After Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2020 Dec;50(12):2209-2236. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01344-2. Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32901442
References
-
- American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:687–708. - PubMed
-
- Allen DG, Lamb GD, Westerblad H. Skeletal muscle fatigue: Cellular mechanisms. Physiol Rev. 2008;88:287–332. - PubMed
-
- Baldari C, Bonavolontà V, Emerenziani GP, Gallotta MC, Silva AJ, Guidetti L. Accuracy, reliability, linearity of Accutrend and Lactate Pro versus EBIO plus analyzer. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;107:105–111. - PubMed
-
- Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–159. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources