Assessment of women's treatment preferences for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause
- PMID: 37650213
- DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2250916
Assessment of women's treatment preferences for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause
Abstract
Background: Several therapies for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause are available. Treatment preferences and willingness-to-pay for VMS treatment among US women with VMS were evaluated.
Methods: An online survey of women with perimenopausal or postmenopausal VMS was conducted (3/15/21-4/23/21). A discrete choice experiment quantified the impact of 7 treatment attributes on VMS treatment choice: VMS frequency/severity reduction, sleep improvement, risk of breast cancer/cardiovascular events in 6 years, risk of short-term side effects, and out-of-pocket costs. Preference weights (PWs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and reported.
Results: Among 467 women, 86.5% and 87.8% reported moderate to very severe VMS and sleep problems during the preceding month, respectively. Sleep improvement (PW: 0.843; 95% CI: 0.721, 0.965) and reduction in VMS frequency (PW: 0.658; 95% CI: 0.520, 0.796) and severity (PW: 0.628; 95% CI: 0.500, 0.756) most influenced treatment preference; risk of cardiovascular events (PW: 0.150; 95% CI: 0.069, 0.232) or breast cancer (PW: 0.401; 95% CI: 0.306, 0.496) in 6 years had lesser effect. Willingness-to-pay was an additional $35-$46/month for substantially improved sleep, 80% VMS frequency reduction, and reduction from severe to mild VMS.
Conclusions: Sleep improvement and reductions in VMS frequency/severity were the most important treatment attributes.
Keywords: Discrete choice experiment; hormones; hot flashes; menopause; patient preference; questionnaires; surveys.
Plain language summary
Hormone and non-hormone treatments are available to reduce vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes and night sweats) due to menopause. We conducted an online survey of 467 women with moderate to very severe vasomotor symptoms during perimenopause or postmenopause to learn what treatment attributes are most important to women when selecting from among the available therapies and how much women were willing to pay for the attributes. Women were shown 14 cards, each with a side-by-side comparison of 2 treatments with varying descriptions of the following 7 treatment attributes: reduction in frequency of vasomotor symptoms, reduction in severity of vasomotor symptoms, improvement in sleep, risk of breast cancer in 6 years, risk of cardiovascular events in 6 years, risk of short-term side effects, and out-of-pocket costs. Women picked their preferred treatment on each card. Results showed that improvement in sleep was the most important attribute to women, and they were willing to pay an extra $46/month for a treatment that substantially improved sleep. The next most important attributes were reduction in frequency and reduction in severity of vasomotor symptoms. Women were willing to pay $36/month more for a treatment that reduced symptom frequency by 80% compared with one that reduced frequency by 50%, and they were willing to pay $35/month more for treatment that reduced symptoms from severe to mild compared with one that did not reduce symptom severity. These results may help guide development of new treatment options and may help physicians recommend treatments that best fit women’s preferences.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence and impact of vasomotor symptoms due to menopause among women in Canada: A subgroup analysis from an international cross-sectional survey of Women with Vasomotor Symptoms Associated with Menopause (WARM Study).Menopause. 2025 Jan 1;32(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002451. Menopause. 2025. PMID: 39729068 Free PMC article.
-
Vasomotor symptom characteristics: are they risk factors for incident diabetes?Menopause. 2018 May;25(5):520-530. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001033. Menopause. 2018. PMID: 29206771 Free PMC article.
-
Vasomotor menopausal symptoms and risk of cardiovascular disease: a pooled analysis of six prospective studies.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):898.e1-898.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.039. Epub 2020 Jun 23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32585222 Free PMC article.
-
Vasomotor symptoms and risk of cardiovascular disease in peri- and postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Maturitas. 2023 May;171:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 6. Maturitas. 2023. PMID: 36907116
-
Effectiveness and safety of fezolinetant in alleviating vasomotor symptoms linked to Menopause.: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Jun;297:142-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Apr 15. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024. PMID: 38640780
Cited by
-
Calculating willingness-to-pay with discrete cost and random coefficients in discrete choice experiments.Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00658-z. Health Econ Rev. 2025. PMID: 40679576 Free PMC article.
-
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Aug;43(8):879-936. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y. Epub 2025 May 21. Pharmacoeconomics. 2025. PMID: 40397369 Free PMC article.
-
What to Expect in 2024: Important Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) Trends.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Dec 21;15:799-809. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S453171. eCollection 2023. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023. PMID: 38274129 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical