Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;37(2):295-300.
doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.07.007. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

Family presence during resuscitation: Perceptions and confidence of intensive care nurses in an Australian metropolitan hospital

Affiliations
Free article

Family presence during resuscitation: Perceptions and confidence of intensive care nurses in an Australian metropolitan hospital

Candice Ann Douglas et al. Aust Crit Care. 2024 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Background: While literature supporting family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) was first published over three decades ago, the practice remains controversial. Benefits have been confirmed, and barriers to practice identified through international research. The extent that FPDR is practised in Australian intensive care units (ICUs) is currently unknown.

Objectives: To examine ICU nurses' previous exposure and experiences with FPDR To establish their perceptions of the risks and benefits of the practice, as well as their confidence participating.

Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study design, using validated FPDR risk-benefits and confidence scales, was distributed electronically to registered nurses working within a single adult ICU in Australia.

Results: Fifty-six percent (n = 45) of respondents had never witnessed FPDR. Respondents were divided on whether families had the right to be present or should be given the option. ICU nurses perceived benefits for families but not for the patients involved or for the nurses participating. Nurses indicated they felt conflicted between the needs of the family, preserving the quality of the care delivered to a deteriorating patient, and protecting the safety of all stakeholders. Support for FPDR was often dependent on the availability of resources such as a family-support person.

Conclusion: This research establishes that ICU nurses lacked exposure to FPDR but were confident in their ability to perform, be observed, and support families during a resuscitation event. Therefore, confidence is likely not a factor in a decision to reject the practice. Further education is indicated as there remained a reluctance to adopt FPDR practice, despite many of the barriers reported having already been largely disproven by the available literature. Institutions have a role in policy development, ensuring adequate resources, and education.

Keywords: Critical care; FPDR; Family presence during resuscitation; Intensive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

LinkOut - more resources