Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Nov;38(14):3115-3122.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08189-1. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening-a Randomized Trial

Affiliations
Review

LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening-a Randomized Trial

Judith M E Walsh et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended for individuals at high risk due to age and smoking history after a shared decision-making conversation. However, little is known about best strategies for incorporating shared decision-making, especially in a busy primary care setting.

Objective: To develop a novel tool, Lung Cancer Assessment of Risk and Education (LungCARE) to guide LCS decisions among eligible primary care patients.

Design: Pilot cluster randomized controlled trial of LungCARE versus usual care.

Participants: Patients of providers in a university primary care clinic, who met criteria for LCS.

Intervention: Providers were randomized to LungCARE intervention or control. LungCARE participants completed a computer tablet-based video assessment of lung cancer educational needs in the waiting room prior to a primary care visit. Patient and provider both received a summary handout of patient concerns and responses.

Main measures: All eligible patients completed baseline interviews by telephone. One week after the index visit, participants completed a follow-up telephone survey that assessed patient-physician discussion of LCS, referral to and scheduling of LCS, as well as LCS knowledge and acceptability of LungCARE. Two months after index visit, we reviewed patients' electronic health records (EHRs) for evidence of a shared decision-making conversation and referral to and receipt of LCS.

Key results: A total of 66 participants completed baseline and follow-up visits (34: LungCARE; 32: usual care). Mean age was 65.9 (± 6.0). Based on EHR review, compared to usual care, LungCARE participants were more likely to have discussed LCS with their physicians (56% vs 25%; p = 0.04) and to be referred to LCS (44% vs 13%; p < 0.02). Intervention participants were also more likely to complete LCS (32% vs 13%; p < 0.01) and had higher knowledge scores (mean score 6.5 (± 1.7) vs 5.5 (± 1.4; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: LungCARE increased discussion, referral, and completion of LCS and improved LCS knowledge.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03862001.

Keywords: lung cancer screening; shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M.SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2010. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2013.
    1. Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M.SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Insitute; 2011.
    1. Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA, et al. Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. JAMA. 2011;306(17):1865–1873. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1591. - DOI - PubMed
    1. NationalLungScreeningTrialResearchT. Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. USPSTF Bulletin: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Issues Draft Recommendation Statement on Screening for Lung Cancer. Washington, DC: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; 2013.

Publication types

Associated data