Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 31;12(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00338-8.

Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in prehabilitation: a scoping review

Affiliations

Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in prehabilitation: a scoping review

Dominique Engel et al. Perioper Med (Lond). .

Abstract

Background: Inadequate study reporting precludes interpretation of findings, pooling of results in meta-analyses, and delays knowledge translation. While prehabilitation interventions aim to enhance candidacy for surgery, to our knowledge, a review of the quality of reporting in prehabilitation has yet to be conducted. Our objective was to determine the extent to which randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of prehabilitation are reported according to methodological and intervention reporting checklists.

Methods: Eligibility criteria: RCTs of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation interventions.

Sources of evidence: search was conducted in March 2022 using MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane.

Charting methods: identified studies were compared to CONSORT, CERT & Modified CERT, TIDieR, PRESENT, and CONSORT-SPI. An agreement ratio (AR) was defined to evaluate if applicable guideline items were correctly reported. Data were analyzed as frequency (n, %) and mean with standard deviation (SD).

Results: We identified 935 unique articles and included 70 trials published from 1994 to 2022. Most prehabilitation programs comprised exercise-only interventions (n = 40, 57%) and were applied before oncologic surgery (n = 32, 46%). The overall mean AR was 57% (SD: 20.9%). The specific mean ARs were as follows: CONSORT: 71% (SD: 16.3%); TIDieR: 62% (SD:17.7%); CERT: 54% (SD: 16.6%); Modified-CERT: 40% (SD:17.8%); PRESENT: 78% (SD: 8.9); and CONSORT-SPI: 47% (SD: 22.1).

Conclusion: Altogether, existing prehabilitation trials report approximately half of the checklist items recommended by methodological and intervention reporting guidelines. Reporting practices may improve with the development of a reporting checklist specific to prehabilitation interventions.

Keywords: ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery); Perioperative medicine; Pre-rehab; Prehab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Spider graphs of the agreement ratios between CONSORT 2010, TIDieR 2014, CERT 2016, Modified-CERT 2017, PRESENT 2020, CONSORT-SPI 2018, and 70 randomized controlled trials of prehabilitation. Checklist items can be found in Supplementary material 1

References

    1. Altman DG. Randomisation. BMJ. 1991;302(6791):1481–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. An J, Ryu HK, Lyu SJ, Yi HJ, Lee BH. Effects of Preoperative Telerehabilitation on Muscle Strength, Range of Motion, and Functional Outcomes in Candidates for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):6071. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Argunova Y, et al. Effects of physical prehabilitation on markers of endothelial function in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:2691.
    1. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
    1. Ausania F, et al. Prehabilitation in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Rev Esp Enferme Dig. 2019;111(8):603–608. - PubMed

Publication types