Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May 18;12(10):2015.
doi: 10.3390/plants12102015.

Effects of Environmental and Non-Environmental Factors on Dynamic Photosynthetic Carbon Assimilation in Leaves under Changing Light

Affiliations
Review

Effects of Environmental and Non-Environmental Factors on Dynamic Photosynthetic Carbon Assimilation in Leaves under Changing Light

Yu-Ting Li et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Major research on photosynthesis has been carried out under steady light. However, in the natural environment, steady light is rare, and light intensity is always changing. Changing light affects (usually reduces) photosynthetic carbon assimilation and causes decreases in biomass and yield. Ecologists first observed the importance of changing light for plant growth in the understory; other researchers noticed that changing light in the crop canopy also seriously affects yield. Here, we review the effects of environmental and non-environmental factors on dynamic photosynthetic carbon assimilation under changing light in higher plants. In general, dynamic photosynthesis is more sensitive to environmental and non-environmental factors than steady photosynthesis, and dynamic photosynthesis is more diverse than steady photosynthesis. Finally, we discuss the challenges of photosynthetic research under changing light.

Keywords: changing light; fluctuating light; higher plant; photosynthetic carbon assimilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Light intensity and dynamic net photosynthetic carbon assimilation rate (Pn) in leaves of C3 species Triticum aestivum. The A area indicates post-irradiance carbon assimilation; the B area indicates the post-irradiance carbon burst; the C area indicates the loss in photosynthetic carbon assimilation in the photosynthetic induction stage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The dynamic net photosynthetic carbon assimilation rate (Pn) in leaves of the C3 species Triticum aestivum and the C4 species Zea mays. The relative Pn curve was obtained from the standardization between the Pn under constant high light (100%) and the minimum Pn under constant low light (0%).

References

    1. Tang Y.H., Washitani I., Tsuchiya T., Iwaki H. Fluctuation of photosynthetic photon flux density within a Miscanthus sinensis canopy. Ecol. Res. 1988;3:253–266. doi: 10.1007/BF02348584. - DOI
    1. Nishimura S., Koizumi H., Tang Y. Spatial and temporal variation in photon flux density on rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaf surface. Plant Prod. Sci. 1998;1:30–36. doi: 10.1626/pps.1.30. - DOI
    1. Taylor S.H., Long S.P. Slow induction of photosynthesis on shade to sun transitions in wheat may cost at least 21% of productivity. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 2017;372:20160543. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0543. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vialet-Chabrand S., Matthews J.S., Simkin A.J., Raines C.A., Lawson T. Importance of fluctuations in light on plant photosynthetic acclimation. Plant Physiol. 2017;173:2163–2179. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01767. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morales A., Kaiser E., Yin X., Harbinson J., Molenaar J., Driever S.M., Struik P.C. Dynamic modelling of limitations on improving leaf CO2 assimilation under fluctuating irradiance. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41:589–604. doi: 10.1111/pce.13119. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources