The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 37654327
- PMCID: PMC10466669
- DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_587_22
The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Retraction in
-
Retraction: The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4 Year Follow Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Oct-Dec;15(4):219. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_1239_23. Epub 2023 Dec 11. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023. PMID: 38235045 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Introduction: Long-term or even indefinite retention is routinely prescribed after orthodontic treatment as a preventive safeguard against post-treatment changes induced by tooth movement, physiological healing, and the aging process. Though both fixed and removable versions of retainers may be equally effective in terms of results, sufficient research to support this assumption is missing at the moment.
Objectives: Long-term effects of fixed and removable retention on the periodontium, and the compliance level when used for an extended period of time.
Methods: For 4 years participants were given a supply of canine-to-canine retainers and vacuum-formed canine-to-canine retainers. The inter-canine, as well as inter-molar widths, the length, and the extraction space opening of the mandibular anterior portion, were measured. Gingival inflammation, calculus, and plaque were observed, as well as the attachment of clinical and the case of bleeding during probing. 42 members had returned in the follow-up period, with 21 from each of the two groups. Measurements of the modified gingival index and plaque scoring were performed on the 10 intra-oral photographs that were taken at 4-week intervals in this study to investigate the intra-examiner reliability.
Results: After controlling for confounding variables, there was a 1.64 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30, 2.98 mm) median between-groups difference among patients who utilized vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs). The treatment groups did not vary in inter-canine and intermolar widths (P = 0.52; 95% CI, -1.07, 1.05), arch length (P = 0.99; 95% CI, -1.15, 1.14), or opening of extraction spaces (P = 0.84).
Conclusion: A long-term study demonstrates that fixed retention can preserve the alignment of the mandibular anterior over time for the first time. Gingival discomfort and higher plaque scores were reported in both types of retainers.
Keywords: Fixed appliance; orthodontics; removable appliance.
Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Effects of fixed vs removable orthodontic retainers on stability and periodontal health: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Aug;154(2):167-174.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.007. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018. PMID: 30075919 Clinical Trial.
-
Can vacuum-formed retainers maintain arch dimensions and alignment compared to Hawley and fixed bonded retainers after treatment with fixed appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Orthod. 2024 Oct 1;46(5):cjae040. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae040. Eur J Orthod. 2024. PMID: 39177154
-
Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 2: periodontal health outcomes after 12 months.Eur J Orthod. 2018 Jul 27;40(4):399-408. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx059. Eur J Orthod. 2018. PMID: 29059293 Clinical Trial.
-
Fixed and removable orthodontic retainers and periodontal health.Evid Based Dent. 2017 Dec 22;18(4):103-104. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401267. Evid Based Dent. 2017. PMID: 29269822
-
Treatment stability with bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.Eur J Orthod. 2022 Mar 30;44(2):187-196. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab073. Eur J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 34719722
Cited by
-
Retraction: The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4 Year Follow Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Oct-Dec;15(4):219. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_1239_23. Epub 2023 Dec 11. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023. PMID: 38235045 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Horowitz SL, Hixon EH. Physiologic recovery following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:1–4. - PubMed
-
- Blake M, Bibby K. Retention and stability:Areview of the literature. Am J Orthod Dento facial Orthop. 1998;114:299–306. - PubMed
-
- Little wood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Retention procedures for stabilizing tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016:CD002283. - PubMed
-
- Xiao-Cen X, Ren-Mei L, Guo-Hua T. Clinical evaluation of lingual fixed retainer combined with Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer. Shanghai J Stomatol. 2011;20:623–6. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources