Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 2;7(1):e178.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.602. eCollection 2023.

Roadmap to engagement: Bringing patient partners into cancer research and beyond

Affiliations

Roadmap to engagement: Bringing patient partners into cancer research and beyond

Kim S Kimminau et al. J Clin Transl Sci. .

Abstract

The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KU Cancer Center) initiated an engagement program to leverage the lived experience of individuals and families with cancer. KU Cancer Center faculty, staff, and patient partners built an infrastructure to achieve a patient-designed, patient-led, and research-informed engagement program called Patient and Investigator Voices Organizing Together (PIVOT). This special communication offers an engagement roadmap that can be replicated, scaled, and adopted at other cancer centers and academic health systems. PIVOT demonstrates that collaboration among academic leaders, investigators, and people with a lived experience yields a patient-centered, vibrant environment that enriches the research enterprise.

Keywords: Cancer; education; engagement model; patient; team science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient and investigator voices organizing together (PIVOT) roadmap.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Use of PIVOT by KU Cancer Center investigators. CB = cancer biology; CPC = cancer prevention and control; D3ET=drug discovery, delivery, and experimental therapeutics.

References

    1. Manafo E, Petermann L, Mason-Lai P, Vandall-Walker V. Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’and ‘what’of patient engagement in health research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liang L, Cako A, Urquhart R, et al. Patient engagement in hospital health service planning and improvement: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e018263. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma AE, Rivadeneira NA, Barr-Walker J, Stern RJ, Johnson AK, Sarkar U. Patient engagement in health care safety: an overview of mixed-quality evidence. Health Affairs. 2018;37(11):1813–1820. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma AE, Knox M, Mleczko VL, Olayiwola JN. The impact of patient advisors on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fergusson D, Monfaredi Z, Pussegoda K, et al. The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(1):1–9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources