Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 1:12:e85682.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.85682.

Examining the association of clinician characteristics with perceived changes in cervical cancer screening and colposcopy practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods assessment

Affiliations

Examining the association of clinician characteristics with perceived changes in cervical cancer screening and colposcopy practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods assessment

Lindsay Fuzzell et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to reductions in cervical cancer screening and colposcopy. Therefore, in this mixed method study we explored perceived pandemic-related practice changes to cervical cancer screenings and colposcopies.

Methods: In 2021, a national sample of 1251 clinicians completed surveys, including 675 clinicians who performed colposcopy; a subset (n=55) of clinicians completed qualitative interviews.

Results: Nearly half of all clinicians reported they were currently performing fewer cervical cancer screenings (47%) and colposcopies (44% of those who perform the procedure) than before the pandemic. About one-fifth (18.6%) of colposcopists reported performing fewer LEEPs than prior to the pandemic. Binomial regression analyses indicated that older, as well as internal medicine and family medicine clinicians (compared to OB-GYNs), and those practicing in community health centers (compared to private practice) had higher odds of reporting reduced screening. Among colposcopists, internal medicine physicians and those practicing in community health centers had higher odds of reporting reduced colposcopies. Qualitative interviews highlighted pandemic-related care disruptions and lack of tracking systems to identify overdue screenings.

Conclusions: Reductions in cervical cancer screening and colposcopy among nearly half of clinicians more than 1 year into the pandemic raise concerns that inadequate screening and follow-up will lead to future increases in preventable cancers.

Funding: This study was funded by the American Cancer Society, who had no role in the study's design, conduct, or reporting.

Keywords: HPV; cervical cancer prevention; cervical cancer screening; epidemiology; global health; none.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LF, NB, HF, PL, AM, AW, SR, MM, SV, RP No competing interests declared

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow diagram depicting potentially eligible, enrolled, and final analytic samples.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Forest plots depicting adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for variables associated with odds of reporting reduced cervical cancer screening (N=1239) in 2021* compared with before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Variables associated with odds of reporting reduced cervical cancer screening include Panel A: Age; B: Race; C: Region; D: Clinician Type; E: Practice Type. *Note. Data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic period of March 2021–July 2021, with participants asked to report whether they were doing ‘fewer’ or ‘the same number or more Pap/HPV/co-tests now than before the pandemic’.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Forest plots depicting adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for variables associated with odds of reporting reduced colposcopies (N=669), in 2021* compared with before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Variables associated with odds of reporting reduced colposcopies include Panel A: Gender; B: Region; C: Clinician Type; D: Practice Type. *Note. Data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic period of March 2021–July 2021, with participants asked to report whether they were doing ‘fewer’ versus ‘the same number or more colposcopies now than before the pandemic’.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1101/2023.01.11.23284437

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Almeida CM, Rodriguez MA, Skootsky S, Pregler J, Steers N, Wenger NS. Cervical cancer screening overuse and underuse: patient and physician factors. The American Journal of Managed Care. 2013;19:482–489. - PubMed
    1. Amram O, Amiri S, Robison J, Pflugeisen CM, Monsivais P. COVID-19 and inequities in colorectal and cervical cancer screening and diagnosis in Washington State. Cancer Medicine. 2022;11:2990–2998. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4655. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJF, Verhoef VMJ, Suonio E, Dillner L, Minozzi S, Bellisario C, Banzi R, Zhao F-H, Hillemanns P, Anttila A. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. The Lancet. Oncology. 2014;15:172–183. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becerra-Culqui TA, Lonky NM, Chen Q, Chao CR. Patterns and correlates of cervical cancer screening initiation in a large integrated health care system. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;218:429. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.209. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–1465. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types