Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;25(5):787-811.
doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01625-3. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

Estimating the monetary value of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Quebec

Affiliations

Estimating the monetary value of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year in Quebec

Christian R C Kouakou et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The value of a Quality-Adjusted Life-Year (QALY) is of great importance for the healthcare system. It helps when it comes to defining a cost-effectiveness threshold for the evaluation of health technologies. No willingness-to-pay value for a QALY exists in the province of Quebec, Canada.

Objectives: In this paper, we empirically investigated the monetary value of a QALY for the population of Quebec.

Methods: Based on the Short-Form 6-Dimension version 2 (SF-6Dv2), we conducted an online survey with a representative adult sample living in Quebec. We used a time trade-off (TTO) combined with contingent valuation (CV), and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess both the population's willingness to pay (WTP) for one QALY and the marginal WTP for health attributes. A health utility algorithm using hybrid regression was developed to determine a preference-based value set for health states.

Results: Main analysis was conducted on 993 answers for the CV and 2143 answers for the DCE. The willingness-to-pay per QALY varied from CA$ 47,048.84 (CI: 21,554.38; 72,543.30) for CV to CA$ 73,936.87 (CI: 63,105.40; 84,768.35) for DCE. Among the 6 dimensions of the SF-6Dv2, marginal WTP varied from CA$ 4499.15 (CI: 2975.06; 6023.25) for more role accomplishment in daily activities to CA$ 15,867.12 (CI: 13,825.75; 17,908.49) for less pain. Robustness check with multiple alternative samples, as well as alternative health utility algorithms, showed that the results were robust and the DCE method provided 50% larger results than the CV method, although confidence intervals overlap.

Conclusion: This paper provides useful information for decision-makers on the monetary value of a QALY in Quebec.

Keywords: Contingent valuation; Discrete choice experiment; QALY; Québec; SF-6Dv2; Time trade-off; WTP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mishan, E.J.: Cost-benefit analysis: an introduction. Praeger, New York (1971)
    1. Verbooy, K., Hoefman, R., van Exel, J., Brouwer, W.: Time is money: investigating the value of leisure time and unpaid work. Value in Health 21, 1428–1436 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.1828 - DOI - PubMed
    1. MSSS, Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec: Le système de santé et de services sociaux au Québec en bref. (2017). https://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/msss/fichiers/2017/17-731-01WF.pdf
    1. CADTH, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health: Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada. 4th Edition (March 2017). https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines_for_the_economic...
    1. HAS, Haute Autorité de Santé: Choix méthodologiques pour l’évaluation économique à la HAS. (Octobre 2011). https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011-11/guide_metho...

LinkOut - more resources