Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep-Oct;38(5):218-228.
doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000136. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

Assessing and Identifying Improvements for Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Population: A Human-Centered Design and Systems Approach

Affiliations
Review

Assessing and Identifying Improvements for Lung Cancer Screening in a Rural Population: A Human-Centered Design and Systems Approach

Shaun A Golding et al. Am J Med Qual. 2023 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Although lung cancer claims more lives than any other cancer in the United States, screening is severely underutilized, with <6% of eligible patients screened nationally in 2021 versus 76% for breast cancer and 67% for colorectal cancer. This article describes an effort to identify key reasons for the underutilization of lung cancer screening in a rural population and to develop interventions to address these barriers suitable for both a large health system and local community clinics. Data were generated from 26 stakeholder interviews (clinicians, clinical staff, and eligible patients), a review of key systems (Electronic Health Record and billing records), and feedback on the feasibility of several potential interventions by health care system staff. These data informed a human-centered design approach to identify possible interventions within a complex health care system by exposing gaps in care processes and electronic health record platforms that can lead patients to be overlooked for potentially life-saving screening. Deployed interventions included communication efforts focused on (1) increasing patient awareness, (2) improving physician patient identification, and (3) supporting patient management. Preliminary outcomes are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tonge JE, Atack M, Crosbie PA, et al. “To know or not to know…?” Push and pull in ever smokers lung screening uptake decision-making intentions. Health Expect. 2019;22:162–172.
    1. Rodríguez-Rabassa MS, Simmons VN, Vega A, et al. Perceptions of and barriers to lung cancer screening among physicians in Puerto Rico: A qualitative study. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31:973–991.
    1. Raz DJ, Wu G, Nelson RA, et al. Perceptions and utilization of lung cancer screening among smokers enrolled in a tobacco cessation program. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;20:e115–e122.
    1. Carter-Harris L, Slaven JE, Monahan PO, et al. Understanding lung cancer screening behaviour using path analysis. J Med Screen. 2020;27:105–112.
    1. Jonnalagadda S, Bergamo C, Lin JJ, et al. Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers. Lung Cancer. 2012;77:526–531.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources