Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 2;5(1):43.
doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00199-y.

Joint aspiration for diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection: when, how, and what tests?

Affiliations
Review

Joint aspiration for diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection: when, how, and what tests?

Nicole Durig Quinlan et al. Arthroplasty. .

Abstract

Diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) requires clinical suspicion in combination with both serological and synovial fluid tests, the results of which are generally applied to validated scoring systems or consensus definitions for PJI. As no single "gold standard" test exists, the diagnosis becomes challenging, especially in the setting of negative cultures or equivocal test results. This review aims to address the workup of chronic PJI and considerations for clinical evaluation to guide treatment. Following aspiration of the joint in question, a multitude of tests has been developed in an attempt to assist with diagnosis, including cell synovial white blood cell count, gram stain, cultures, leukocyte esterase, alpha-defensin, synovial C-reactive protein, multiplex polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing, and interleukins. Each test has advantages and disadvantages and should be used in conjunction with the overall clinical picture to guide further clinical evaluation and treatment in this complex patient population.

Keywords: Arthroplasty; Aspiration; Diagnosis; Hip; Infection; Knee.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Parvizi J, Gehrke T, International Consensus Group on Periprosthetic Joint Infection Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(7):1331. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, della Valle C, Chen AF, et al. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1309–1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, della Valle CJ, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(11):2992–2994. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, Spangehl M, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, et al. Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(11):2102–9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01199. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Austin MS, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Lindsay A, Parvizi J. A simple, cost-effective screening protocol to rule out periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(1):65–8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources