Mental health of help-seeking outpatients pre and post COVID-19: A real-world data, multicentre study
- PMID: 37661846
- DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2906
Mental health of help-seeking outpatients pre and post COVID-19: A real-world data, multicentre study
Abstract
Objective: A great deal of research addresses the mental health implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for the general population. Little is known about the implications for mental health of help-seeking outpatients and for the effectiveness of mental health services. The present study investigated the mental health and treatment response of help-seeking outpatients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Method: Routine outcome monitoring data from 3706 clients in the United States and Northern Europe was analysed using multilevel modelling with global subjective well-being as the dependent variable.
Results: As opposed to before the pandemic, during the pandemic, well-being scores were significantly higher at intake and improvement throughout treatment was significantly smaller in the US sample, while both were comparable in the EU sample.
Conclusion: Although there is also evidence of less effective treatments since the pandemic, no conclusive picture emerges that portrays the impact of the pandemic on mental health as uniform. More research is needed to elucidate the impact of the pandemic on the help-seeking population.
Keywords: COVID-19; mental health; outpatients; routine outcome monitoring; treatment response.
© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ahrens, K. F., Neumann, R. J., Kollmann, B., Plichta, M. M., Lieb, K., Tüscher, O., & Reif, A. (2021). Differential impact of COVID-related lockdown on mental health in Germany. World Psychiatry, 20(1), 140-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20830
-
- de Beurs, E., Blankers, M., Peen, J., Rademacher, C., Padgorski, A., & Dekker, J. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 social distancing measures on routine mental health care provision and treatment outcome for common mental disorders in the Netherlands. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 29(4), 1342-1354. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2713
-
- Eustis, E. H., Cardona, N., Nauphal, M., Sauer-Zavala, S., Rosellini, A. J., Farchione, T. J., & Barlow, D. H. (2020). Experiential avoidance as a mechanism of change across cognitive-behavioral therapy in a sample of participants with heterogenous anxiety disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 44, 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-10063-6
-
- McAleavey, A. A., & Moltu, C. (2021). Understanding routine outcome monitoring and clinical feedback in context: Introduction to the special section. Psychotherapy Research, 31(2), 142-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2020.1866786
-
- Miller, S. D., Bargmann, S., Chow, D., Seidel, J., & Maeschalck, C. (2016). Feedback-informed treatment (FIT): Improving the outcome of psychotherapy one person at a time. In W. O'Donohue & A. Maragakis (Eds.), Quality improvement in behavioral health (pp. 247-262). Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26209-3_16
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials