Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 17:13:1228631.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1228631. eCollection 2023.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for detecting lower respiratory tract infections in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from children

Affiliations

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for detecting lower respiratory tract infections in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from children

Ruihe Shi et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Lower respiratory tract infections are common in children. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid has long been established as the best biological sample for detecting respiratory tract infections; however, it is not easily collected in children. Sputum may be used as an alternative yet its diagnostic accuracy remains controversial. Therefore, this study sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sputum for detecting lower respiratory tract infections using metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Paired sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples were obtained from 68 patients; pathogens were detected in 67 sputum samples and 64 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples by metagenomic next-generation sequencing, respectively. The combined pathogen-detection rates in the sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples were 80.90% and 66.2%, respectively. For sputum, the positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) for detecting bacteria were 0.72 and 0.73, respectively, with poor Kappa agreement (0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.218-0.578, P < 0.001). However, viral detection in sputum had good sensitivity (0.87), fair specificity (0.57), and moderate Kappa agreement (0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.231-0.693, P < 0.001). The PPVs and NPVs for viral detection in sputum were 0.82 and 0.67, respectively. The consistency between the sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was poor for bacterial detection yet moderate for viral detection. Thus, clinicians should be cautious when interpreting the results of sputum in suspected cases of lower respiratory tract infections, particularly with regards to bacterial detection in sputum. Viral detection in sputum appears to be more reliable; however, clinicians must still use comprehensive clinical judgment.

Keywords: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; lower respiratory tract infection; metagenomic next-generation sequencing; pediatric; sputum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. MP, M. pneumoniae; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; CMV: cytomegalovirus; Flu, influenza; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; ADV, adenovirus; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing results from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. The horizontal coordinates represent each patient from 1 to 68. The vertical coordinates represent positive (red) and negative (blue) results for pathogen detection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
mNGS pathogen identification in BALF and sputum samples (A) Identification of pathogens in BALF and sputum samples in patients with negative culture results. (B) BALF culture results from 68 patients: 12 positives (blue), 56 negatives (yellow) (C) Identification of pathogens in BALF and sputum samples in patients with positive culture results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Azadeh N., Sakata K. K., Brighton A. M., Vikram H. R., Grys T. E. (2015). FilmArray respiratory panel assay: comparison of nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53, 3784–3787. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01516-15 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bogoch I. I., Andrews J. R., Zachary K. C., Hohmann E. L. (2013). Diagnosis of influenza from lower respiratory tract sampling after negative upper respiratory tract sampling. Virulence 4, 82–84. doi: 10.4161/viru.22466 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boonyaratanakornkit J., Vivek M., Xie H., Pergam S. A., Cheng G.-S., Mielcarek M., et al. . (2020). Predictive value of respiratory viral detection in the upper respiratory tract for infection of the lower respiratory tract with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J. Infect. Dis. 221, 379–388. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz470 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bryce J., Boschi-Pinto C., Shibuya K., Black R. E., WHO Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (2005). WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet Lond. Engl. 365, 1147–1152. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71877-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burns J. L., Emerson J., Kuypers J., Campbell A. P., Gibson R. L., McNamara S., et al. . (2012). Respiratory viruses in children with cystic fibrosis: viral detection and clinical findings. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 6, 218–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00292.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources