Identifying factors associated with user retention and outcomes of a digital intervention for substance use disorder: a retrospective analysis of real-world data
- PMID: 37663407
- PMCID: PMC10474970
- DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad072
Identifying factors associated with user retention and outcomes of a digital intervention for substance use disorder: a retrospective analysis of real-world data
Abstract
Objectives: Successful delivery of digital health interventions is affected by multiple real-world factors. These factors may be identified in routinely collected, ecologically valid data from these interventions. We propose ideas for exploring these data, focusing on interventions targeting complex, comorbid conditions.
Materials and methods: This study retrospectively explores pre-post data collected between 2016 and 2019 from users of digital cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-containing psychoeducation and practical exercises-for substance use disorder (SUD) at UK addiction services. To identify factors associated with heterogenous user responses to the technology, we employed multivariable and multivariate regressions and random forest models of user-reported questionnaire data.
Results: The dataset contained information from 14 078 individuals of which 12 529 reported complete data at baseline and 2925 did so again after engagement with the CBT. Ninety-three percent screened positive for dependence on 1 of 43 substances at baseline, and 73% screened positive for anxiety or depression. Despite pre-post improvements independent of user sociodemographics, women reported more frequent and persistent symptoms of SUD, anxiety, and depression. Retention-minimum 2 use events recorded-was associated more with deployment environment than user characteristics. Prediction accuracy of post-engagement outcomes was acceptable (Area Under Curve [AUC]: 0.74-0.79), depending non-trivially on user characteristics.
Discussion: Traditionally, performance of digital health interventions is determined in controlled trials. Our analysis showcases multivariate models with which real-world data from these interventions can be explored and sources of user heterogeneity in retention and symptom reduction uncovered.
Conclusion: Real-world data from digital health interventions contain information on natural user-technology interactions which could enrich results from controlled trials.
Keywords: digital health intervention; real-world data exploration; real-world uptake; secondary use; substance use disorder.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Conflict of interest statement
F.G. is partially supported by a Research Collaboration Agreement between the University of Manchester and TELUS Health (previously LifeWorks UK), an international digital company who own the BFO program. S.E.-D. supervises peer-reviewed research at TELUS Health (previously LifeWorks UK).
Figures






Similar articles
-
On the Difficulty of Predicting Engagement with Digital Health for Substance Use.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:967-971. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230319. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023. PMID: 37203546
-
Adherence and Engagement With a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Conversational Agent (Wysa for Chronic Pain) Among Adults With Chronic Pain: Survival Analysis.JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 23;6(5):e37302. doi: 10.2196/37302. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 35526201 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the Trial: Systematic Review of Real-World Uptake and Engagement With Digital Self-Help Interventions for Depression, Low Mood, or Anxiety.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 6;20(6):e199. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9275. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29875089 Free PMC article.
-
Real-world Implementation of a Smartphone-Based Psychoeducation Program for Bipolar Disorder: Observational Ecological Study.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e31565. doi: 10.2196/31565. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35107440 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for adults with a history of complex traumatic events: the INCiTE mixed-methods systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(43):1-312. doi: 10.3310/hta24430. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32924926 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ali MM, Teich JL, Mutter R.. Reasons for not seeking substance use disorder treatment: variations by health insurance coverage. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44(1):63-74. - PubMed
-
- Browne T, Priester MA, Clone S, et al.Barriers and facilitators to substance use treatment in the rural South: a qualitative study. J Rural Health. 2016;32(1):92-101. - PubMed
-
- Black C. Review of Drugs. London: Home Office; 2020.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources