Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 31:15:17562872231194921.
doi: 10.1177/17562872231194921. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

The outcomes of penile prosthesis in neurologic patients: a multicentric retrospective series

Marco Falcone  1   2   3 , Paolo Capogrosso  4 , Lorenzo Cirigliano  2 , Paolo Geretto  5 , Mirko Preto  2 , Massimiliano Timpano  2 , Carlo Ceruti  2 , Federica Peretti  2 , Ilaria Ferro  2 , Natalia Plamadeala  2 , Federico Dehò  4 , Carlo Bettocchi  6 , Celeste Manfredi  7 , Lorenzo Spirito  8 , Alessandro Palmieri  9 , Alberto Manassero  5 , Gideon Blecher  10   11 , Paolo Gontero  2
Affiliations

The outcomes of penile prosthesis in neurologic patients: a multicentric retrospective series

Marco Falcone et al. Ther Adv Urol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Neurological disease is a known entity for causing erectile dysfunction (ED). Pharmacological therapies are not always effective these patients - penile prosthesis implant (PPI) is an established surgical treatment option. For a variety of reasons, neurological patients may experience differing outcomes of PPI compared to those whose ED arises from other causes. We investigated outcomes of PPI in neurological patients using the Italian multi-institutional national registry of penile prostheses [Italian Nationwide Systematic Inventarization of Surgical Treatment for ED (INSIST-ED)].

Methods: Patients undergoing PPI were investigated via the INSIST-ED registry, from 2014 to 2021. Data were prospectively recorded by 45 surgeons on a dedicated website (www.registro.andrologiaitaliana.it) and reviewed by a data manager. We subselected patients with neurological disease undergoing PPI for ED, and these patients were reviewed at 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. Postoperative complications and functional outcomes were evaluated through validated questionnaires [International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), Sexual Encounter Profile 2-3, and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS)]. A nonvalidated questionnaire was administered to assess patient satisfaction.

Results: A total of 33 patients were included with a median age of 49 [interquartile range (IQR) 41-55]. Median follow-up was 83 months (IQR 67-99.5). A penoscrotal approach for PPI was performed in most cases (90.9%), while infrapubic was used in three cases (9.1%). Inflatable and malleable devices were implanted in 30 (90.9%) and 3 cases (9.1%), respectively. Intraoperative complications occurred in one case (3%). Early postoperative complications (<90 days) were observed in three cases (9.1%): two wound dehiscence (Clavien-Dindo G1 and G3a respectively) and one device infection requiring prosthesis explant (Clavien-Dindo G3a). Mechanical failures of inflatable devices were not observed during the follow-up period. Median IIEF-5 before surgery was 8 (IQR 7-9). At the latest follow-up, IIEF-5 was 22 (IQR 19-23.5), and median EDITS was 79 (IQR 64-88). A total of 28 patients (84.8%) self-reported to be fully satisfied with the PPI.

Conclusion: Although PPI in the neurological population has been historically considered to be at increased risk, in our study, PPI complications and infections rates in this cohort did not differ from general population.

Keywords: erectile dysfunction; neurological patients; penile prosthesis; penile prosthesis infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Likert’s five-point scale on ‘ad hoc’ questions about patients’ satisfaction toward the PPI. PPI, penile prosthesis implant.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hentzen C, Musco S, Amarenco G, et al.. Approach and management to patients with neurological disorders reporting sexual dysfunction. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21: 551–562. - PubMed
    1. Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J, et al.. EAU Working Group on Male Sexual and Reproductive Health. European Association of Urology Guidelines on sexual and reproductive health-2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol 2021; 80: 333–357. - PubMed
    1. Collins KP, Hackler RH. Complications of penile prostheses in the spinal cord injury population. J Urol 1988; 140: 984–985. - PubMed
    1. Dave CN, Khalaf A, Patel HD, et al.. Neurogenic bladder is an independent risk factor for complications associated with inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Int J Impot Res 2020; 32: 520–524. - PubMed
    1. Xardel V, Guy L, Neuville P, et al.. Implant pénien pour dysfonction érectile chez le patient neurologique, indication, complications et satisfaction : étude rétrospective sur 27 patients. [Penile prosthesis for erectile dysfunction in the neurological patient, indication, complications and satisfaction: Retrospective study on 27 patients]. Prog Urol 2021; 31:223–230. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources