Traditional and novel imaging modalities for advanced prostate cancer: A critical review
- PMID: 37664103
- PMCID: PMC10471808
- DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_170_20
Traditional and novel imaging modalities for advanced prostate cancer: A critical review
Abstract
Accurate detection of metastatic prostate cancer in the setting of preoperative staging as well as posttreatment recurrence is crucial to provide patients with appropriate and timely treatment of their disease. This has traditionally been accomplished with a combination of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan. Recently, more novel imaging techniques have been developed to help improve the detection of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. This review discusses the efficacy of the traditional imaging modalities as well as the novel imaging techniques in detecting metastatic prostate cancer. Articles discussed were gathered through a formal PubMed search.
Keywords: Imaging; metastatic; prostate cancer.
Copyright: © 2023 Urology Annals.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
A Prospective Comparison of 18F-prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-1007 Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Whole-body 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging, and Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography with Traditional Imaging in Primary Distant Metastasis Staging of Prostate Cancer (PROSTAGE).Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):635-644. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jul 13. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 32675047 Clinical Trial.
-
More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using 18F-PSMA PET/CT.Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7. Hell J Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 30843003
-
State-of-the-art imaging techniques in the management of preoperative staging and re-staging of prostate cancer.Int J Urol. 2019 Jan;26(1):18-30. doi: 10.1111/iju.13797. Epub 2018 Sep 20. Int J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30238516 Review.
-
Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review.Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1415-1427. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.20. Transl Androl Urol. 2020. PMID: 32676426 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How PET-CT is Changing the Management of Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer?: Comment la TEP-TDM Peut Modifier la Prise en Charge du Cancer de la Prostate Non Métastatique Résistant à la Castration ?Prog Urol. 2022 Jun;32(6S1):6S43-6S53. doi: 10.1016/S1166-7087(22)00174-9. Prog Urol. 2022. PMID: 36719646 Review.
Cited by
-
Distinguishing Physiological Ureter Uptake From an Involved Lymph Node in Staging Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Scans: Implications for Radiation Planning.Cureus. 2024 Jun 25;16(6):e63105. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63105. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39055460 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging assessment of prostate cancer recurrence: advances in detection of local and systemic relapse.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Feb;50(2):807-826. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04412-7. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025. PMID: 39254707 Review.
References
-
- Street W. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2020. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2020.
-
- Litwin MS, Tan HJ. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer:A review. JAMA. 2017;317:2532–42. - PubMed
-
- Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281:1591–7. - PubMed
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate Cancer (version 1.2018. 2018. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 20]. Available from:https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf .
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources