CASUS and APACHE II score in predicting mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting
- PMID: 37664771
- PMCID: PMC10472474
- DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2023.24787
CASUS and APACHE II score in predicting mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting
Abstract
Background: This study aims to compare Cardiac Surgery Score (CASUS) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scoring systems for predicting mortality in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
Methods: Between January 2019 and March 2019, a total of 204 patients (166 males, 38 females; mean age: 60.5±0.7 years; range, 59.2 to 61.9 years) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and were monitored at least for 24 h in the intensive care unit postoperatively were included. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were recorded. The CASUS and APACHE II scores were calculated using the most abnormal values for each variable during the first 24 h, postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were seven-day mortality and 30-day mortality, need for reintubation, readmission to the intensive care unit, length of intensive care unit stay and length of hospital stay.
Results: The 30-day overall mortality was 4.9% (n=10). The CASUS scores were significantly higher for patients developing mortality within 30 days postoperatively (p=0.030) and for patients needing reintubation (p=0.003). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis predicting seven-day mortality and prolonged intensive care unit stay, the area under curve was higher for CASUS scoring compared to APACHE II (0.90 vs. 0.72 and 0.82 vs. 0.76).
Conclusion: The CASUS may prove to be a more reliable scoring system than APACHE II for predicting mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
Keywords: APACHE II; CASUS; cardiac surgery; mortality..
Copyright © 2023, Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Validation of Cardiac Surgery Score (CASUS) in Postoperative Cardiac Patients.Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Dec;24(4):304-312. doi: 10.1177/1089253220936786. Epub 2020 Jul 3. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020. PMID: 32615890
-
Analysis of the Performance of Daily Cardiac Surgery Score (CASUS) in Patients with Mixed Racial Profile after Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Apr;36(4):986-994. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.11.041. Epub 2021 Dec 7. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022. PMID: 35033436
-
Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction in a Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Comparative Study.Am J Crit Care. 2015 Jul;24(4):327-34; quiz 335. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015500. Am J Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 26134333
-
A comparative study of four intensive care outcome prediction models in cardiac surgery patients.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Mar 1;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-21. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21362175 Free PMC article.
-
Inclusion of 'ICU-Day' in a Logistic Scoring System Improves Mortality Prediction in Cardiac Surgery.Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2015 Jul 3;21:145-52. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.895003. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2015. PMID: 26137928 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Probiotic mitigates gut hypoperfusion-associated acute gastrointestinal injury in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized controlled trial.BMC Med. 2025 Apr 23;23(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04082-2. BMC Med. 2025. PMID: 40264088 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Kartufan FF, Karaoğlu K. Mortality after cardiac surgery; a comparison of BNP, EuroSCORE and SOFA Score. GKD Anest Yoğ Bak Dern Derg. 2018;24:111–117. doi: 10.5222/GKDAD.2018.06978. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources