Sharing FAIR monitoring program data improves discoverability and reuse
- PMID: 37665400
- DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11788-4
Sharing FAIR monitoring program data improves discoverability and reuse
Abstract
Data resulting from environmental monitoring programs are valuable assets for natural resource managers, decision-makers, and researchers. These data are often collected to inform specific reporting needs or decisions with a specific timeframe. While program-oriented data and related publications are effective for meeting program goals, sharing well-documented data and metadata allows users to research aspects outside initial program intentions. As part of an effort to integrate data from four long-term large-scale US aquatic monitoring programs, we evaluated the original datasets against the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles and offer recommendations and lessons learned. Differences in data governance across these programs resulted in considerable effort to access and reuse the original datasets. Requirements, guidance, and resources available to support data publishing and documentation are inconsistent across agencies and monitoring programs, resulting in various data formats and storage locations that are not easily found, accessed, or reused. Making monitoring data FAIR will reduce barriers to data discovery and reuse. Programs are continuously striving to improve data management, data products, and metadata; however, provision of related tools, consistent guidelines and standards, and more resources to do this work is needed. Given the value of these data and the significant effort required to access and reuse them, actions and steps intended on improving data documentation and accessibility are described.
Keywords: Aquatic habitat; Data management; Data sharing; Environmental monitoring; FAIR data; Metadata.
© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
References
-
- Al-Chokhachy, R., Roper, B. B., & Archer, E. K. (2010). Evaluating the status and trends of physical stream habitat in headwater streams within the interior Columbia River and upper Missouri River basins using an index approach. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 139(4), 1041–1059. https://doi.org/10.1577/T08-221.1 - DOI
-
- Archer, E., Hough-Snee, N., Van Wagenen, A., Lokteff, R., & Roper, B. B. (2012). The PACFISH/INFISH Biological Opinion (PIBO) Effectiveness Monitoring Program and invasive plant species detection: A retrospective summary 2003–2011. 26.
-
- Boeckhout, M., Zielhuis, G. A., & Bredenoord, A. L. (2018). The FAIR guiding principles for data stewardship: Fair enough? European Journal of Human Genetics, 26(7), 931–936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0160-0 - DOI
-
- Bricker, O. P., & Ruggiero, M. A. (1998). Toward a national program for monitoring environmental resources. Ecological Applications, 8(2), 326–329. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0326:TANPFM]2.0.CO;2 - DOI
-
- Bureau of Land Management Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring Project Team. (2021). I_Indicators [vector digital data]. BLM national AIM lotic indicators ArcGIS Hub. Retrieved September 1, 2022, from https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/BLM-EGIS::blm-natl-aim-loti...
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
