Treatment intervals and survival for women diagnosed with early breast cancer in Queensland: the Breast Cancer Outcomes Study, a population-based cohort study
- PMID: 37667512
- DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52091
Treatment intervals and survival for women diagnosed with early breast cancer in Queensland: the Breast Cancer Outcomes Study, a population-based cohort study
Abstract
Objectives: To assess associations between breast cancer-specific survival and timeliness of treatment, based on 2020 Australian guidelines for the treatment of early breast cancer.
Design: Population-based cohort study; analysis of linked Queensland Cancer Register, patient medical record, and National Death Index data, supplemented by telephone interviews.
Setting, participants: Women aged 20-79 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during 1 March 2010 - 30 June 2013, followed to 31 December 2020.
Main outcome measures: Breast cancer-specific survival for women who received or did not receive treatment within the recommended timeframe, overall and for six treatment intervals; optimal cut-points for each treatment interval; characteristics of women for whom treatment was not provided within the recommended timeframe.
Results: Of 5426 eligible women, 4762 could be invited for interviews; complete data were available for 3044 women (56% of eligible women, 65% of invited women). Incomplete compliance with guideline interval recommendations was identified for 1375 women (45%); their risk of death from breast cancer during the follow-up period was greater than for those for whom guideline compliance was complete (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.96). Risk of death was greater for women for whom the diagnosis to surgery interval exceeded 29 days (aHR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.19-2.59), the surgery to chemotherapy interval exceeded 36 days (aHR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.13-2.36), or the chemotherapy to radiotherapy interval exceeded 31 days (aHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.19-2.80). Treatment intervals longer than recommended were more frequent for women for whom breast cancer was detected by public facility screening (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.22-2.04) or by symptoms (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.79) than when cancer had been detected in private facilities, and for women without private health insurance (aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.66-2.32) or living outside major cities (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.18-1.62).
Conclusions: Breast cancer-specific survival was poorer for women for whom the diagnosis to surgery, surgery to chemotherapy, or chemotherapy to radiotherapy intervals exceeded guideline-recommended limits. Our findings support 2020 Australian guideline recommendations regarding timely care.
Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Guidelines as topic; Risk factors; Survival analysis; Treatment outcome.
© 2023 The Authors. Medical Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of AMPCo Pty Ltd.
Comment in
-
The importance of early breast cancer treatment: delay can be deadly.Med J Aust. 2023 Nov 6;219(9):408. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52123. Epub 2023 Oct 5. Med J Aust. 2023. PMID: 37798641 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Individual and area level factors associated with the breast cancer diagnostic-treatment interval in Queensland, Australia.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Feb;203(3):575-586. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07134-4. Epub 2023 Nov 6. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024. PMID: 37930491 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Rurality and Disadvantage on the Diagnostic Interval for Breast Cancer in a Large Population-Based Study of 3202 Women in Queensland, Australia.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Nov 19;13(11):1156. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13111156. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27869758 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term Mortality in Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer During Pregnancy or Postpartum.JAMA Oncol. 2023 Jun 1;9(6):791-799. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0339. JAMA Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37022714 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise therapies for preventing or treating aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms in early breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 29;1(1):CD012988. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012988.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 31994181 Free PMC article.
-
Sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 18;2(2):CD012873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012873.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30776132 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Impact of Quality Improvement Interventions on Biopsy-to-Treatment Time in Breast Cancer: Results from the PROMPT Quality Collaborative of the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17935-0. Online ahead of print. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40783671
References
-
- Australian Institution of Health and Welfare. Cancer data in Australia. Updated 4 Oct 2022. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia/contents... (view July 2023).
-
- Minicozzi P, Van Eycken L, Molinie F, et al; European HR Working Group on breast cancer. Comorbidities, age and period of diagnosis influence treatment and outcomes in early breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2019; 144: 2118-2127.
-
- Martinez A, Daubisse-Marliac L, Lacaze JL, et al; EvaSein Group. Treatment time interval in breast cancer: a population-based study on the impact of type and number of cancer centres attended. Eur J Cancer Care 2022; 31: e13654.
-
- Pratt D, Burneikis T, Tu C, Grobmyer S. Time to completion of breast cancer treatment and survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28: 8600-8608.
-
- Queensland Health. Queensland breast cancer quality index. Practice indicators of safe, quality cancer care: public and private hospitals 2010-2019. June 2022. https://cancerallianceqld.health.qld.gov.au/reports/breastreport2022webs... (viewed July 2023).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical