The Reliability of the Divergence Angle for Evaluating Rotational Implant Positioning in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
- PMID: 37667718
- PMCID: PMC10475295
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42956
The Reliability of the Divergence Angle for Evaluating Rotational Implant Positioning in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
Abstract
Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a highly effective surgical procedure used to treat patients with osteoarthritis affecting a single knee compartment. UKA has gained significant popularity, accompanied by an expansion of its surgical indications. This increasing trend can be attributed to the consistently excellent clinical outcomes associated with UKA, which rival those achieved with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, despite these advancements, implant rotation malposition remains a prevalent factor contributing to early failure in UKA cases. The aim of this study is to analyze the rotational positioning of femorotibial implants in UKA and to identify an appropriate angle formed by the femoral component and the tibial component using a newly described angle. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients' data of 40 medial UKA cases of 33 patients who were operated on in our hospital between October 1998 and March 2019. The study introduces a new angle called the "divergence angle." This angle is formed between the lateral portion of the femoral component and the lateral part of the tibial component, as measured on a patellofemoral Merchant view at 30 degrees of knee flexion. The divergence angle was evaluated through radiographic assessment by two independent reviewers. Results According to statistical analysis, the divergence angle was highly reliable with both intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Intra-observer reproducibility was excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between 0.901 and 0.933 (p < 0.001). The inter-observer reproducibility was excellent with an ICC of 0.92 (p < 0.001). The Gaussian curve confirmed the normal distribution of the divergence angle values with moderate dispersion of values. The majority of the angles of divergence (85%) measured between the femoral and tibial components were less than 10 degrees (n = 34), with a mean angle of 6.3 ± 4.5°. Conclusion The divergence angle between the femoral and tibial components, measured at 30 degrees of knee flexion using the Merchant view, is an easily accessible, reliable, and reproducible method. This technique enables the assessment of the optimal rotational positioning of implants in medial UKA.
Keywords: divergence angle; knee osteoarthritis; knee surgery; rotational positioning; unicompramental knee arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2023, Hardy et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures




Similar articles
-
[Influence of rotatory malposition of femoral implant in failure of unicompartimental medial knee prosthesis].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006 Sep;92(5):473-84. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(06)75834-2. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006. PMID: 17088741 French.
-
Image-based robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty allowed to match the rotation of the tibial implant with the native kinematic knee alignment.Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):519-526. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05637-1. Epub 2022 Nov 24. Int Orthop. 2023. PMID: 36422703
-
Femorotibial rotational mismatch of the Oxford unicompartmental knee in the flexion position is a risk for poor outcomes.Knee. 2020 Jun;27(3):1064-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 8. Knee. 2020. PMID: 32276816
-
Progression of medial osteoarthritis and long term results of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty: 10 to 18 year follow-up of 54 consecutive implants.Knee. 2014;21 Suppl 1:S26-32. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(14)50006-3. Knee. 2014. PMID: 25382364 Review.
-
Clinical outcome of bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for both medial and lateral femorotibial arthritis: a systematic review-is there proof of concept?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1503-1513. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03492-6. Epub 2020 Jun 11. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020. PMID: 32529388
References
-
- The choice of prosthetic materials and evaluation of results. Mckeever DC. https://journals.lww.com/clinorthop/Citation/1955/00060/The_Choice_of_Pr.... Clin Orthop. 1955;6:17–21. - PubMed
-
- Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:151–156. - PubMed
-
- Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Atzori F, Schirò M, De Feo C, Borromeo N, Russo R. Ann Joint. 2017;2:39.
-
- Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. Migliorini F, Tingart M, Niewiera M, Rath B, Eschweiler J. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29:947–955. - PubMed
-
- Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12473714/ J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:2235–2239. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources