Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep;64(5):435-447.
doi: 10.4111/icu.20230121.

How far has robot-assisted partial nephrectomy reached?

Chung Un Lee  1 , Mahmood Alabbasi  2 , Jae Hoon Chung  1 , Minyong Kang  1 , Seong Il Seo  3
Affiliations
Review

How far has robot-assisted partial nephrectomy reached?

Chung Un Lee et al. Investig Clin Urol. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Nephron-sparing surgery is the standard treatment for small renal mass (SRM). Nephron-sparing surgery has evolved from an open to a minimally invasive technique. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is the latest technique in this field and is reported to be safe and feasible, showing oncologically and functionally superior or compatible results compared with open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for SRM. This is not limited to only SRM but also applies to large and complex renal masses and other challenging situations. RAPN showed good oncological and functional outcomes for ≥clinical T2 renal tumors, complex renal masses (PADUA score ≥10, RENAL score ≥10), hilar renal tumors, and multiple renal tumors. In addition, the outcomes of RAPN in these challenging cases were not inferior to those in conventional cases. RAPN could also be applied to a number of challenging cases in which the open technique was considered first. RAPN showed good results in patients with a solitary kidney, horseshoe kidney, and in repeat surgeries. Furthermore, RAPN could be safely performed on obese, elderly, and pediatric patients. Finally, this review evaluates efficiency and utility of RAPN based on the results of challenging cases of renal masses and to project the future of RAPN.

Keywords: Kidney cancer; Nephrectomy; Robotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Large and complex renal tumors. (A) Renal with RENAL score 11xh. (B) Renal with RENAL score 10a.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (A) Posterior renal hilar tumor on CT image. (B) Anterior renal hilar tumor on CT image. CT, computed tomography.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC, Omar MI, Lam TB, Hilvano-Cabungcal AM, et al. UCAN Systematic Review Reference Group. EAU Renal Cancer Guideline Panel. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol. 2012;61:972–993. Erratum in: Eur Urol 2012;62:193. - PubMed
    1. Chung HC, Kang TW, Lee JY, Hwang EC, Park HJ, Hwang JE, et al. Tumor enucleation for the treatment of T1 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Investig Clin Urol. 2022;63:126–139. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saoud R, Abou Heidar N, Aizen J, Andolfi C, Galansky L, Ahmed O, et al. Long term renal function following selective angioembolization for iatrogenic vascular lesions after partial nephrectomy: a matched case-control study. Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62:267–273. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krimphove MJ, Reese SW, Chen X, Marchese M, Pucheril D, Cone E, et al. Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: opioid use and workplace absenteeism. Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62:56–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67:891–901. - PubMed