Factors Affecting Healthcare Provider Referral to Heart Function Clinics: A Mixed-Methods Study
- PMID: 37669639
- DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000001029
Factors Affecting Healthcare Provider Referral to Heart Function Clinics: A Mixed-Methods Study
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) care providers are gatekeepers for patients to appropriately access lifesaving HF clinics.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate referring providers' perceptions regarding referral to HF clinics, including the impact of provider specialty and the coronavirus disease pandemic.
Methods: An exploratory, sequential design was used in this mixed-methods study. For the qualitative stage, semistructured interviews were performed with a purposive sample of HF providers eligible to refer (ie, nurse practitioners, cardiologists, internists, primary care and emergency medicine physicians) in Ontario. Interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams. Transcripts were analyzed concurrently by 2 researchers independently using NVivo, using a deductive-thematic approach. Then, a cross-sectional survey of similar providers across Canada was undertaken via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), using an adapted version of the Provider Attitudes toward Cardiac Rehabilitation and Referral scale.
Results: Saturation was achieved upon interviewing 7 providers. Four themes arose: knowledge about clinics and their characteristics, providers' clinical expertise, communication and relationship with their patients, and clinic referral process and care continuity. Seventy-three providers completed the survey. The major negative factors affecting referral were skepticism regarding clinic benefit (4.1 ± 0.9/5), a bad patient experience and believing they are better equipped to manage the patient (both 3.9). Cardiologists more strongly endorsed clarity of referral criteria, referral as normative and within-practice referral supports as supporting appropriate referral versus other professionals ( P s < .02), among other differences. One-third (n = 13) reported the pandemic impacted their referral practices (eg, limits to in-person care, patient concerns).
Conclusion: Although there are some legitimate barriers to appropriate clinic referral, greater provider education and support could facilitate optimal patient access.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2020;76(25):2982–3021.
-
- Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, Sefarovic P, Rosano GMC, Coats AJS. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res . 2023;118(17):3272–3287.
-
- Ezekowitz JA, O'Meara E, McDonald MA, et al. 2017 comprehensive update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of heart failure. Can J Cardiol . 2017;33(11):1342–1433.
-
- Greene SJ, Adusumalli S, Albert NM, et al. Building a heart failure clinic: a practical guide from the Heart Failure Society of America. J Card Fail . 2021;27(1):2–19.
-
- Abrahamyan L, Ross H, Gianetti N, et al. Access and referral to heart failure clinics in Canada: a narrative review. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs . 2020;30(3):4–11. https://sgrace.info.yorku.ca/publications/ .
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
