Surgical evolution in spinal dural arteriovenous fistula treatment-a 7 years monocentric experience

Abstract

Accounting for 70% of all spinal vascular malformations, spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVF) are the most common type of malformation. Interruption of the fistulous arterialized vein point is the goal of surgical treatment. The aim of the study was to compare open surgery (laminectomy) versus minimal invasive surgery (MIS) in SDAVF treatment. Between March 2013 and March 2020, we retrospectively collected 21 consecutive adult patients with SDAVF. Since March 2017, MIS has been routinely used for surgical treatment. Pre- and post-operative clinical evaluations used Aminoff-Logue score (ALS). Complication rate was noted. Post-operative occlusion of the malformation was confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in all patients. MIS was compared to open surgery in terms of efficacy and complications with statistical evaluation. Standard laminectomy was performed in 12 patients and MIS technique in 9 patients. No difference was noted on pre-operative parameters. ALS and MRI signs of myelopathy were improved in all cases except for 1 patient in each group. All SDAVFs were excluded based on post-operative DSA. Significant differences were noted between the 2 groups in terms of perioperative blood loss (p<0.001), post-operative pain visual analog scale values (p<0.001), and first time out of bed (p<0.001). Wrong level surgery occurred in one patient in each group; patients were re-operated using the same technique. No infection or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was noted. In our experience, MIS is a safe alternative to open laminectomy for SDAVF treatment. MIS contributes to patient comfort and minimizes blood loss without increasing complication rate.

Keywords: Mini invasive spine surgery; Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas.