Personal determinants of change agents' decision-making behavior in community health promotion: a qualitative study
- PMID: 37670263
- PMCID: PMC10481515
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16590-y
Personal determinants of change agents' decision-making behavior in community health promotion: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background: Implementing environmental changes to promote healthier communities requires initial positive decisions by change agents from local politics and government. However, there is little research on what influences the change agents' decisions. This explorative, qualitative study aims to identify the personal determinants of the decision-making behavior of local change agents.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews to assess the personal determinants of decision-making behavior among 22 change agents from local politics and government. Relevant determinants were identified through a structured content analysis of the interview transcripts using the software MAXQDA 2020.
Results: We found the following seven essential clusters of personal determinants of the decision-making behavior of change agents from local politics and government: Imprinting, socialization, and biography; experiences and involvement; attitudes and outcome expectations towards important issues and aspects; knowledge; emotions; personal benefits; and the perceived influences of others.
Conclusions: The identified personal determinants might serve as a source of understanding the decision-making behavior of change agents in community decision-making processes. Our findings can contribute to the effective planning and implementation of evidence-based multilevel interventions related to changing environmental conditions in communities and provide important information on which personal determinants should be considered when derive strategies for community health promotion within a systematic approach of developing an intervention program theory.
Keywords: Change agents; Community; Decision-making; Determinants; Health promotion; Implementation; Intervention mapping; Local government; Local politics; Planning.
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Research project EUBeKo].Pravent Gesundh. 2023 Apr 29:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11553-023-01036-5. Online ahead of print. Pravent Gesundh. 2023. PMID: 40479017 Free PMC article. German.
-
Obstacles and opportunities to using research evidence in local public health decision-making in England.Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jun 28;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0446-x. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019. PMID: 31248422 Free PMC article.
-
Heterosexual female adolescents' decision-making about sexual intercourse and pregnancy in rural Ontario, Canada.Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3664. Epub 2016 Jan 30. Rural Remote Health. 2016. PMID: 26826735
-
Health behaviour change theories: contributions to an ICF-based behavioural exercise therapy for individuals with chronic diseases.Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(24):2091-100. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.891056. Epub 2014 Feb 25. Disabil Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24564358 Review.
-
Social Emotional Learning and the promotion of equal personal relationships among adolescents in Panama: a study protocol.Health Promot Int. 2021 Aug 24;36(3):741-752. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa114. Health Promot Int. 2021. PMID: 33051640 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bartholomew Eldredge LK, Markham CM, Ruiter RAC, Fernández ME, Kok G, Parcel GS. Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass a Wiley Brand; 2016.
-
- Simons-Morton BG, McLeroy KR, Wendel ML. Behavior theory in health promotion practice and research. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources