Should primary anastomosis be considered more? A retrospective analysis of anastomotic complications in young children
- PMID: 37671119
- PMCID: PMC10476123
- DOI: 10.1136/wjps-2023-000565
Should primary anastomosis be considered more? A retrospective analysis of anastomotic complications in young children
Abstract
Objective: Little is known about intestinal anastomotic leakage and stenosis in young children (≤3 years of age). The purpose of this study is to answer the following questions: (1) what is the incidence of anastomotic stenosis and leakage in infants? (2) which surgical diseases entail the highest incidence of anastomotic stenosis and leakage? (3) what are perioperative factors associated with anastomotic stenosis and leakage?
Methods: Patients who underwent an intestinal anastomosis during primary abdominal surgery in our tertiary referral centre between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively included. Both general incidence and incidence per disease of anastomotic complications were determined. Technical risk factors (location and type of anastomosis, mode of suturing, and suture resorption time) were evaluated by multivariate Cox regression for anastomotic stenosis. Gender and American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score of ≥III were evaluated by χ2 test for anastomotic leakage.
Results: In total, 477 patients underwent an anastomosis. The most prominent diseases are intestinal atresia (30%), Hirschsprung's disease (29%), and necrotizing enterocolitis (14%). Anastomotic stenosis developed in 7% (34/468) of the patients with highest occurrence in necrotizing enterocolitis (14%, 9/65). Colonic anastomosis was associated with an increased risk of anastomotic stenosis (hazard ratio (HR) =3.6, 95% CI 1.8 to 7.5). No technical features (type of anastomosis, suture resorption time and mode of suturing) were significantly associated with stenosis development. Anastomotic leakage developed in 5% (22/477) of the patients, with the highest occurrence in patients with intestinal atresia (6%, 9/143). An ASA score of ≥III (p=0.03) and male gender (p=0.03) were significantly associated with anastomotic leakage.
Conclusions: Both anastomotic stenosis and leakage are major surgical complications. Identifying more patient specific factors can result in better treatment selection, which should not solely be based on the type of disease.
Keywords: Congenital Abnormalities; Pediatrics.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Risk factors for anastomotic complications after one-stage anastomosis for oesophageal atresia.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jun 19;16(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01557-0. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 34147095 Free PMC article.
-
Multicentre randomized clinical trial of colonic J pouch or straight stapled colorectal reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.Br J Surg. 2019 Aug;106(9):1147-1155. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11222. Epub 2019 Jun 24. Br J Surg. 2019. PMID: 31233220 Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of interrupted versus continuous suture technique on intestinal anastomotic leakage rate in patients with Crohn's disease - a propensity score matched analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Oct;37(10):2245-2253. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04252-1. Epub 2022 Oct 10. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022. PMID: 36216902 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and colorectal anastomotic leakage. NSAIDs and anastomotic leakage.Dan Med J. 2012 Mar;59(3):B4420. Dan Med J. 2012. PMID: 22381097 Review.
-
Review of Colonic Anastomotic Leakage and Prevention Methods.J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 16;9(12):4061. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124061. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 33339209 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources