Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classification Systems for Informing Better Outcomes of Adenomyosis After Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablating Surgery
- PMID: 37671487
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28943
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classification Systems for Informing Better Outcomes of Adenomyosis After Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablating Surgery
Abstract
Background: A referenced MRI-based classification associated with focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) outcomes is lacking in adenomyosis.
Purpose: To identify an MRI-based classification system for informing the FUAS outcomes.
Study type: Retrospective.
Population: Patients with FUAS for adenomyosis, were divided into a training set (N = 643; 355 with post-FUAS gonadotropin-releasing hormone/levonorgestrel, 288 without post-FUAS therapy) and an external validation set (N = 135; all without post-FUAS therapy).
Field strength/sequence: 1.5 T, turbo spin-echo T2-weighted imaging and single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging sequences.
Assessment: Five MRI-based adenomyosis classifications: classification 1 (C1) (diffuse, focal, and mild), C2 (intrinsic, extrinsic, intramural, and indeterminate), C3 (internal, adenomyomas, and external), C4 (six subtypes on areas [internal or external] and volumes [<1/3 or ≥2/3]), and C5 (internal [asymmetric or symmetric], external, intramural, full thickness [asymmetric or symmetric]) for FUAS outcomes (symptom relief and recurrence).
Statistical tests: The optimal classification was significantly associated with the most subtypes of FUAS outcomes. Relating to the timing of recurrence was measured using Cox regression analysis and median recurrence time was estimated by a Kaplan-Meier curve. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Dysmenorrhea relief and recurrence were only associated with C2 in training patients undergoing FUAS alone. Compared with other subtypes, the extrinsic subtype of C2 was significantly associated with dysmenorrhea recurrence in the FUAS group. Besides, the median dysmenorrhea recurrence time of extrinsic subtype was significantly shorter than that of other subtypes (42.0 months vs. 50.3 months). In the validation cohort, C2 was confirmed as the optimal system and its extrinsic subtype was confirmed to have a significantly shorter dysmenorrhea recurrence time than other subtypes.
Data conclusion: Classification 2 can inform dysmenorrhea relief and recurrence in patients with adenomyosis undergoing FAUS only. Itsextrinsic subtype was associated with an earlier onset of dysmenorrhea recurrence after treatment.
Evidence level: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
Keywords: adenomyosis; classification; dysmenorrhea; focused ultrasound ablation surgery; menorrhagia; recurrence.
© 2023 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Comment in
-
Editorial for "Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classification Systems for Informing Better Outcomes of Adenomyosis After Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablating Surgery".J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 May;59(5):1798-1799. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28988. Epub 2023 Sep 13. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024. PMID: 37702415 No abstract available.
References
-
- Exacoustos C, Lazzeri L, Martire FG, et al. Ultrasound findings of adenomyosis in adolescents: Type and grade of the disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2022;29(2):291‐299.e1.
-
- Younes G, Tulandi T. Conservative surgery for adenomyosis and results: A systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25(2):265‐276.
-
- Zhang L, Rao F, Setzen R. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: Selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017;96(6):707‐714.
-
- Liu X, Wang W, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li Q, Tang J. Clinical predictors of Long‐term success in ultrasound‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound ablation treatment for Adenomyosis: A retrospective study. Medicine 2016;95(3):e2443.
-
- Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, Yabuta M, Suginami R, Taniguchi F. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207(2):114.e1‐114.e7.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- 2020KFKT003/Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering
- 2021KFKT022/Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering
- 22SXQT0254/Nanchong Science and Technology Bureau
- 22SXQT0344/Nanchong Science and Technology Bureau
- 22SXQT0134/Nanchong Science and Technology Bureau
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
