The Eotaxin-1/CCR3 Axis and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Are Critical in Anti-NC16A IgE-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid
- PMID: 37672029
- PMCID: PMC10592335
- DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300080
The Eotaxin-1/CCR3 Axis and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Are Critical in Anti-NC16A IgE-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid
Abstract
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune bullous skin disease of humans and is characterized by eosinophilic inflammation and circulating and tissue-bound IgG and IgE autoantibodies directed against two hemidesmosomal proteins: BP180 and BP230. The noncollagenous 16A domain (NC16A) of BP180 has been found to contain major epitopes recognized by autoantibodies in BP. We recently established the pathogenicity of anti-NC16A IgE through passive transfer of patient-derived autoantibodies to double-humanized mice that express the human high-affinity IgE receptor, FcεRI, and human NC16A domain (FcεRI/NC16A). In this model, anti-NC16A IgEs recruit eosinophils to mediate tissue injury and clinical disease in FcεRI/NC16A mice. The objective of this study was to characterize the molecular and cellular events that underlie eosinophil recruitment and eosinophil-dependent tissue injury in anti-NC16A IgE-induced BP. We show that anti-NC16A IgEs significantly increase levels of key eosinophil chemoattractants, eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-2, as well as the proteolytic enzyme matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in the lesional skin of FcεRI/NC16A mice. Importantly, neutralization of eotaxin-1, but not eotaxin-2, and blockade of the main eotaxin receptor, CCR3, drastically reduce anti-NC16A IgE-induced disease activity. We further show that anti-NC16A IgE/NC16A immune complexes induce the release of MMP-9 from eosinophils, and that MMP-9-deficient mice are resistant to anti-NC16A IgE-induced BP. Lastly, we find significantly increased levels of eotaxin-1, eotaxin-2, and MMP-9 in blister fluids of BP patients. Taken together, this study establishes the eotaxin-1/CCR3 axis and MMP-9 as key players in anti-NC16A IgE-induced BP and candidate therapeutic targets for future drug development and testing.
Copyright © 2023 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.
Figures





References
-
- Schmidt E, Schmidt E, and Zillikens D. 2013. Pemphigoid diseases. Lancet. 381: 320–332. - PubMed
-
- Amber KT, Murrell DF, Schmidt E, Joly P, and Borradori L. 2018. Autoimmune subepidermal bullous diseases of the skin and mucosae: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol. 54: 26–51. - PubMed
-
- Egami S, Yamagami J, and Amagai M. 2020. Autoimmune bullous skin diseases, pemphigus and pemphigoid. J Allergy Clinical Immunol. 145: 1031–1047. - PubMed
-
- Giudice GJ, Emery DJ, and Diaz LA. 1992. Cloning and primary structural analysis of the bullous pemphigoid autoantigen BP180. J Invest Dermatol. 99: 243–250. - PubMed
-
- Zillikens D, Rose PA, Balding SD, Liu Z, Olague-Marchan M, Diaz LA, and Giudice GJ. 1997. Tight clustering of extracellular BP180 epitopes recognized by bullous pemphigoid autoantibodies. J Invest Dermatol. 109: 573–579. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous