From political pledges to quantitative mapping of climate mitigation plans: Comparison of two European cities
- PMID: 37672136
- PMCID: PMC10481584
- DOI: 10.1186/s13021-023-00236-y
From political pledges to quantitative mapping of climate mitigation plans: Comparison of two European cities
Abstract
Background: Urban agglomerates play a crucial role in reaching global climate objectives. Many cities have committed to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions, but current emission trends remain unverifiable. Atmospheric monitoring of greenhouse gases offers an independent and transparent strategy to measure urban emissions. However, careful design of the monitoring network is crucial to be able to monitor the most important sectors as well as adjust to rapidly changing urban landscapes.
Results: Our study of Paris and Munich demonstrates how climate action plans, carbon emission inventories, and urban development plans can help design optimal atmospheric monitoring networks. We show that these two European cities display widely different trajectories in space and time, reflecting different emission reduction strategies and constraints due to administrative boundaries. The projected carbon emissions rely on future actions, hence uncertain, and we demonstrate how emission reductions vary significantly at the sub-city level.
Conclusions: We conclude that quantified individual cities' climate actions are essential to construct more robust emissions trajectories at the city scale. Also, harmonization and compatibility of plans from various cities are necessary to make inter-comparisons of city climate targets possible. Furthermore, dense atmospheric networks extending beyond the city limits are needed to track emission trends over the coming decades.
Keywords: Climate action plan; Climate neutrality; Emission inventory; Fossil fuel emissions; Greenhouse gases; Urban planning.
© 2023. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Nations of Economic Affairs Division World urbanization prospects the . World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision. New York: United Nations New York; 2018. p. 2019.
-
- Field CB, Barros VR, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Abdrabo M-K, Adger N, Anokhin YA, Anisimov OA, Arent DJ, Barnett J, et al. Summary for policymakers climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability Part a global and sectoral aspects contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
-
- Seto K, Bigio A, Blanco H, Delgado G, Dewar D, Huang L, et al. Mitigation of climate change. Clim Change. 2014;1454:361–409.
-
- Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A, Officer S, Rama B, et al. Climate change 2022 impacts, adaptation and vulnerability working group II contribution to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2022.
-
- Climate Chance: Global synthesis report on local climate action. 2022. https://www.climate-chance.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/bt2022_eng_com... Accessed 18 Nov 2022.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
