Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Nov 1;158(11):1133-1140.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3944.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy After Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Patients With Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Who Had Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy After Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Patients With Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Who Had Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Jung-Yun Lee et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) has shown survival benefits for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. However, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the integration of HIPEC into clinical practice.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ICS with HIPEC compared with ICS alone in clinical practice for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective, multicenter, comparative effectiveness cohort study enrolled 205 patients with stage III or IV ovarian cancer who had received at least 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by ICS with HIPEC or ICS without HIPEC at 7 Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group institutions between September 1, 2017, and April 22, 2022. Nine patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria.

Exposures: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by ICS with HIPEC or ICS without HIPEC.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) and the safety profile were the key secondary end points.

Results: This study included 196 patients (median age, 58.0 years [range, 38-82 years]), of whom 109 underwent ICS with HIPEC and 87 underwent ICS without HIPEC. The median duration of follow-up was 28.2 months (range, 3.5-58.6 months). Disease recurrence occurred in 128 patients (65.3%), and 30 patients (15.3%) died. Interval cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC was associated with a significant improvement in median PFS compared with ICS without HIPEC (22.9 months [95% CI, 3.5-58.6 months] vs 14.2 months [95% CI, 4.0-56.2 months]; P = .005) and median OS (not reached [95% CI, 3.5 months to not reached] vs 53.0 [95% CI, 4.6-56.2 months]; P = .002). The frequency of grade 3 or 4 postoperative complications was similar in both groups (ICS with HIPEC, 3 of 109 [2.8%] vs ICS without HIPEC, 3 of 87 [3.4%]; P > .99). Among patients with recurrence, the frequency of peritoneal recurrence was lower in the ICS with HIPEC group than in the ICS without HIPEC group (21 of 64 [32.8%] vs 41 of 64 [64.1%]; P = .001).

Conclusions and relevance: This study suggests that ICS in conjunction with HIPEC was associated with longer PFS and OS than ICS without HIPEC for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer and was not associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. The lower rate of peritoneal recurrence after HIPEC may be associated with improved OS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram of Patients
HIPEC indicates hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; ICS, interval cytoreductive surgery; and NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) According to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)
HR indicates hazard ratio; ICS, interval cytoreductive surgery; and NR, not reached.

References

    1. Sant M, Chirlaque Lopez MD, Agresti R, et al. ; EUROCARE-5 Working Group . Survival of women with cancers of breast and genital organs in Europe 1999-2007: results of the EUROCARE-5 study. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(15):2191-2205. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kyrgiou M, Salanti G, Pavlidis N, Paraskevaidis E, Ioannidis JP. Survival benefits with diverse chemotherapy regimens for ovarian cancer: meta-analysis of multiple treatments. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(22):1655-1663. doi:10.1093/jnci/djj443 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee YJ, Lee JY, Nam EJ, Kim SW, Kim S, Kim YT. Rethinking radical surgery in interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1235. doi:10.3390/jcm9041235 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morgan RJ Jr, Alvarez RD, Armstrong DK, et al. ; National Comprehensive Cancer Networks . Ovarian cancer, version 2.2013. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(10):1199-1209. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2013.0142 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee YJ, Woo HY, Kim YN, et al. . Dynamics of the tumor immune microenvironment during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(9):2308. doi:10.3390/cancers14092308 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types